Casio EX-H30 vs Pentax MX-1
92 Imaging
38 Features
40 Overall
38
84 Imaging
37 Features
60 Overall
46
Casio EX-H30 vs Pentax MX-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 201g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 391g - 122 x 61 x 51mm
- Launched July 2013
Casio EX-H30 vs Pentax MX-1 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-H30 versus Pentax MX-1, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Pentax. There is a noticeable difference among the resolutions of the EX-H30 (16MP) and MX-1 (12MP) and the EX-H30 (1/2.3") and MX-1 (1/1.7") come with different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-H30 was unveiled 3 years earlier than the MX-1 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a detailed comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the EX-H30 scores vs the MX-1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-H30 vs Pentax MX-1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H30 & Pentax MX-1. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H30 Gallery & Pentax MX-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H30 over the Pentax MX-1
EX-H30 | MX-1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax MX-1 over the Casio EX-H30
MX-1 | EX-H30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2013 | January 2011 | More recent by 30 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 920k | 461k | Crisper display (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H30 and Pentax MX-1
EX-H30 | MX-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display size | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch display | No Touch display |
Casio EX-H30 vs Pentax MX-1 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-H30 has physical measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) while the Pentax MX-1 has specifications of 122mm x 61mm x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") with a weight of 391 grams (0.86 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-H30 versus Pentax MX-1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-H30 and the MX-1.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the EX-H30 and MX-1 is 92 and 84 respectively.
Casio EX-H30 vs Pentax MX-1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to visualize the difference in sensor measurements only by checking out specifications. The visual underneath should provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H30 and MX-1.
To sum up, each of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The EX-H30 using its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF tougher and the Casio EX-H30 will provide more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics much more aggressively. The older EX-H30 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H30 vs Pentax MX-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-H30 vs Pentax MX-1 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Pentax MX-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Pentax |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Pentax MX-1 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2011-01-05 | 2013-07-01 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD with AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 12.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Speed sync, Trailing Curtain sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 201 gr (0.44 pounds) | 391 gr (0.86 pounds) |
Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 122 x 61 x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 208 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 290 photos |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-130 | D-Li-106 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $709 | $400 |