Casio EX-H30 vs Ricoh WG-70
Portability
92 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
92 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
Portability
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
Casio EX-H30 vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs
Casio EX-H30
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 201g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed January 2011
Ricoh WG-70
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced February 2020
- Newer Model is Ricoh WG-80
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-H30 vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Casio EX-H30 vs Ricoh WG-70, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-H30 (16MP) and the WG-70 (16MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras offer the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-H30 was brought out 10 years prior to the WG-70 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a complete comparison, here is a concise overview of how the EX-H30 grades against the WG-70 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-H30 vs Ricoh WG-70 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H30 and Ricoh WG-70. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-H30 Gallery and Ricoh WG-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H30 over the Ricoh WG-70
| EX-H30 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Casio EX-H30
| WG-70 | EX-H30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2020 |  | January 2011 | Fresher by 110 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H30 and Ricoh WG-70
| EX-H30 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H30 vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera, you should think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H30 comes with external dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-70 has dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-H30 vs Ricoh WG-70 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are using at the time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-H30 against the WG-70.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H30 and WG-70 is 92 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-H30 vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to picture the difference in sensor sizing simply by seeing a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H30 and WG-70.
As you can see, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the exact same MP therefore you should expect comparable quality of files however you have to take the production date of the cameras into account. The older EX-H30 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Casio EX-H30 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-H30 Portrait photography highlights
Ricoh WG-70 Portrait photography highlights
has manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
no external flash support
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
has manual focus
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
supports face detect autofocus
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Casio EX-H30 as a Street photography camera
Ricoh WG-70 as a Street photography camera
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (201g)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
image stabilization (Digital)
environment proof
no moving screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Casio EX-H30 Sports photography factors
Ricoh WG-70 Sports photography factors
amazing zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
image stabilization (Digital)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
supports tracking focus
environment proof
no shutter priority mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Casio EX-H30 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh WG-70 as a Travel photography camera
lighter than competition in class (201g)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
long zoom (300mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
environment proof
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
rather wide (28mm)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-H30 Landscape photography highlights
Ricoh WG-70 Landscape photography highlights
has manual focus
reasonably wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
lack of Time Lapse mode
has manual focus
rather wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
environment proof
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is small (2.7")
manual mode not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-H30 Vlogging highlights
Ricoh WG-70 Vlogging highlights
reasonably wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (201 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external mic port
rather wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
supports face detect autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of microphone support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Casio EX-H30 vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Ricoh WG-70 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Ricoh WG-70 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2011-01-05 | 2020-02-04 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 201g (0.44 lbs) | 193g (0.43 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 images |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | - | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $709 | $280 |
