Casio EX-H30 vs Ricoh WG-M1
92 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Casio EX-H30 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 201g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Announced September 2014
Photography Glossary Casio EX-H30 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
In this write-up, we will be matching up the Casio EX-H30 versus Ricoh WG-M1, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-H30 (16MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is pretty similar and they come with the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-H30 was unveiled 4 years before the WG-M1 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a complete comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the EX-H30 scores against the WG-M1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-H30 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H30 & Ricoh WG-M1. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H30 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H30 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| EX-H30 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 115k | Clearer screen (+346k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Casio EX-H30
| WG-M1 | EX-H30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2014 |  | January 2011 | More recent by 44 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H30 and Ricoh WG-M1
| EX-H30 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Casio EX-H30 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H30 comes with physical dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-M1 has sizing of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-H30 versus Ricoh WG-M1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select at that moment. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-H30 compared to the WG-M1.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H30 and WG-M1 is 92 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-H30 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements purely by going over technical specs. The visual underneath should provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H30 and WG-M1.
As you have seen, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You can expect the Casio EX-H30 to offer you more detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older EX-H30 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-H30 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-H30 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | (1×) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 1.5" |
| Screen resolution | 461k dot | 115k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | - |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 201g (0.44 lbs) | 190g (0.42 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 shots |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | - | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $709 | $2,000 |