Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung EX2F
92 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
90 Imaging
37 Features
62 Overall
47
Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung EX2F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 201g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
- 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
- Introduced December 2012
Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung EX2F Overview
Lets look more closely at the Casio EX-H30 versus Samsung EX2F, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the EX-H30 (16MP) and EX2F (12MP) and the EX-H30 (1/2.3") and EX2F (1/1.7") posses totally different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-H30 was announced 23 months prior to the EX2F which makes them a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short introduction of how the EX-H30 scores versus the EX2F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung EX2F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H30 & Samsung EX2F. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-H30 Gallery & Samsung EX2F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H30 over the Samsung EX2F
EX-H30 | EX2F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 461k | 0k | Sharper screen (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung EX2F over the Casio EX-H30
EX2F | EX-H30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | December 2012 | January 2011 | Fresher by 23 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-H30 and Samsung EX2F
EX-H30 | EX2F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen sizing | |
Touch friendly screen | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung EX2F Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H30 has outer dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) whilst the Samsung EX2F has measurements of 112mm x 62mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-H30 versus Samsung EX2F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-H30 against the EX2F.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H30 and EX2F is 92 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung EX2F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizing purely by reading a spec sheet. The visual below might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H30 and EX2F.
As you can see, each of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The EX-H30 using its tinier sensor will make shooting bokeh more difficult and the Casio EX-H30 will deliver extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older EX-H30 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung EX2F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Samsung EX2F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Samsung EX2F |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2011-01-05 | 2012-12-18 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-80mm (3.3x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/1.4-2.7 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 0 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | AMOLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | - |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 201g (0.44 lb) | 294g (0.65 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 48 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 209 |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-130 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $709 | $478 |