Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung GX-1S
92 Imaging
38 Features
40 Overall
38
68 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung GX-1S Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 201g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 605g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Announced January 2006
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung GX-1S Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Casio EX-H30 versus Samsung GX-1S, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the EX-H30 (16MP) and GX-1S (6MP) and the EX-H30 (1/2.3") and GX-1S (APS-C) posses different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-H30 was unveiled 5 years later than the GX-1S and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-H30 being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-1S being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a concise summary of how the EX-H30 scores against the GX-1S when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung GX-1S Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H30 & Samsung GX-1S. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-H30 Gallery & Samsung GX-1S Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H30 over the Samsung GX-1S
| EX-H30 | GX-1S | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2011 | January 2006 | More recent by 61 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 461k | 210k | Crisper screen (+251k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1S over the Casio EX-H30
| GX-1S | EX-H30 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H30 and Samsung GX-1S
| EX-H30 | GX-1S | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More accurate focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung GX-1S Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H30 has external measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) whilst the Samsung GX-1S has measurements of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 605 grams (1.33 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-H30 versus Samsung GX-1S in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose at the time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-H30 and the GX-1S.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H30 and GX-1S is 92 and 68 respectively.
Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung GX-1S Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements merely by looking through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H30 and GX-1S.
As you can see, each of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The EX-H30 with its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF more difficult and the Casio EX-H30 will render more detail having an extra 10MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs more aggressively. The newer EX-H30 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung GX-1S Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Samsung GX-1S | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Samsung GX-1S |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
| Announced | 2011-01-05 | 2006-01-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 6MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3008 x 2008 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 200 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Available lenses | - | 151 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 210 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 201 gr (0.44 lb) | 605 gr (1.33 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-130 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/MMC card |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $709 | $850 |