Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung SL202
92 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 201g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Released February 2009
- Additionally referred to as PL50
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung SL202, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There is a big difference between the resolutions of the EX-H30 (16MP) and SL202 (10MP) but they come with the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-H30 was unveiled 23 months after the SL202 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a concise overview of how the EX-H30 scores against the SL202 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H30 and Samsung SL202. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H30 Gallery and Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H30 over the Samsung SL202
| EX-H30 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2011 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 23 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Casio EX-H30
| SL202 | EX-H30 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H30 and Samsung SL202
| EX-H30 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-H30 features physical dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) and the Samsung SL202 has proportions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung SL202 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-H30 and the SL202.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H30 and SL202 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to see the gap between sensor dimensions simply by looking at specs. The picture underneath should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H30 and SL202.
All in all, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Casio EX-H30 to resolve more detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more modern EX-H30 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Samsung SL202 |
| Also called as | - | PL50 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2011-01-05 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 201 grams (0.44 pounds) | 168 grams (0.37 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-130 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $709 | $140 |