Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung WB2200F
92 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 201g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
- Released January 2014
Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung WB2200F Overview
Let's look more closely at the Casio EX-H30 versus Samsung WB2200F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-H30 (16MP) and the WB2200F (16MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-H30 was manufactured 4 years before the WB2200F and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-H30 being a Compact camera and the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go into a more detailed comparison, here is a short highlight of how the EX-H30 scores versus the WB2200F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung WB2200F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H30 & Samsung WB2200F. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H30 Gallery & Samsung WB2200F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H30 over the Samsung WB2200F
EX-H30 | WB2200F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 461k | 460k | Crisper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Casio EX-H30
WB2200F | EX-H30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2014 | January 2011 | Fresher by 36 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H30 and Samsung WB2200F
EX-H30 | WB2200F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H30 comes with outer measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) and the Samsung WB2200F has dimensions of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") and a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-H30 versus Samsung WB2200F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-H30 compared to the WB2200F.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-H30 and WB2200F is 92 and 59 respectively.
Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizing only by checking specifications. The graphic below should provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H30 and WB2200F.
Plainly, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the identical resolution and you can expect similar quality of pictures however you should really factor the age of the products into consideration. The older EX-H30 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Samsung WB2200F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Samsung WB2200F |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 200 thousand dots |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 1/8 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 8.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 6.00 m (ISO Auto) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 201g (0.44 pounds) | 708g (1.56 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-130 | BP-1410 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | - | SD, SDHC, SCXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $709 | $599 |