Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung WB35F
92 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 201g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced January 2014
Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Casio EX-H30 versus Samsung WB35F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-H30 (16MP) and the WB35F (16MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-H30 was manufactured 4 years earlier than the WB35F and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the EX-H30 matches up against the WB35F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H30 and Samsung WB35F. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-H30 Gallery and Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H30 over the Samsung WB35F
EX-H30 | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Casio EX-H30
WB35F | EX-H30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2014 | January 2011 | More recent by 36 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H30 and Samsung WB35F
EX-H30 | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-H30 provides outside dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) and the Samsung WB35F has proportions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-H30 versus Samsung WB35F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is a front view size comparison of the EX-H30 vs the WB35F.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H30 and WB35F is 92 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to imagine the gap in sensor measurements merely by going through specs. The visual below will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H30 and WB35F.
As you can plainly see, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the exact same MP and you should expect comparable quality of pictures however you really should factor the production date of the cameras into account. The older EX-H30 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Samsung WB35F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Samsung WB35F |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2011-01-05 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 201g (0.44 lbs) | 194g (0.43 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-130 | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | - | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $709 | $130 |