Clicky

Casio EX-H30 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro

Portability
92
Imaging
39
Features
40
Overall
39
Casio Exilim EX-H30 front
 
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
Portability
70
Imaging
63
Features
38
Overall
53

Casio EX-H30 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs

Casio EX-H30
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 201g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
  • Introduced January 2011
Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Released February 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Casio EX-H30 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview

Following is a complete analysis of the Casio EX-H30 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Sigma. The sensor resolution of the EX-H30 (16MP) and the DP2 Quattro (20MP) is pretty comparable but the EX-H30 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) provide different sensor size.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The EX-H30 was released 4 years earlier than the DP2 Quattro which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-H30 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before diving straight to a full comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the EX-H30 scores versus the DP2 Quattro with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-H30 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 EX-H30 DP2 Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Casio EX-H30

 DP2 Quattro EX-H30 
ReleasedFebruary 2014January 2011More modern by 37 months
Screen resolution920k461kClearer screen (+459k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-H30 and Sigma DP2 Quattro

 EX-H30 DP2 Quattro 
Manually focus Dial exact focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen size
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither contains Touch friendly screen

Casio EX-H30 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H30 has got outside measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) and the Sigma DP2 Quattro has measurements of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).

Check the Casio EX-H30 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-H30 vs the DP2 Quattro.

Casio EX-H30 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H30 and DP2 Quattro is 92 and 70 respectively.

Casio EX-H30 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-H30 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is tough to picture the gap in sensor sizes just by seeing specs. The image underneath might provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H30 and DP2 Quattro.

All in all, both cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The EX-H30 because of its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF more difficult and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will provide greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-H30 will be behind in sensor technology.

Casio EX-H30 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison

Casio EX-H30 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-H30 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Casio EX-H30
Portrait photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
39
focusing manually
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
can't use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
77
has manual focus
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
includes face detection focusing
delivers RAW formats
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Casio EX-H30 Street photography advice
Sigma DP2 Quattro Street photography advice
62
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (201g)
no articulating screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
61
decent sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-H30 as a Sports photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Sports photography camera
52
great zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
supports tracking focus
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
48
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
fixed focal length (45mm)
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
no image stabilization
lacks phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-H30 as a Travel photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Travel photography camera
69
lighter than competition (201 grams)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
has built in flash
rather wide (24mm)
very long zoom (300mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
53
resolution is good (20MP)
display is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-H30 Landscape photography information
Sigma DP2 Quattro Landscape photography information
49
focusing manually
rather wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
lack of Timelapse recording
59
has manual focus
nice screen size (3 inch)
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (45mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Casio EX-H30
Vlogging with Sigma DP2 Quattro
30
rather wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (201 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of microphone jack
9
no video recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-H30 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-H30 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
 Casio Exilim EX-H30Sigma DP2 Quattro
General Information
Manufacturer Casio Sigma
Model type Casio Exilim EX-H30 Sigma DP2 Quattro
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Large Sensor Compact
Introduced 2011-01-05 2014-02-13
Physical type Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Chip Exilim Engine 5.0 TRUE III engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 5424 x 3616
Highest native ISO 3200 6400
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Total focus points - 9
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-300mm (12.5x) 45mm (1x)
Max aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/2.8
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 461 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Display technology Super Clear TFT color LCD TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8 seconds 30 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate - 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye no built-in flash
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) -
Highest video resolution 1280x720 None
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 201g (0.44 pounds) 395g (0.87 pounds)
Physical dimensions 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-130 BP-51
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse shooting
Card slots Single Single
Retail pricing $709 $931