Casio EX-H30 vs Sony A200
92 Imaging
38 Features
40 Overall
38
66 Imaging
48 Features
38 Overall
44
Casio EX-H30 vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 201g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Released July 2008
- New Model is Sony A230
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-H30 vs Sony A200 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Casio EX-H30 versus Sony A200, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Casio and Sony. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the EX-H30 (16MP) and A200 (10MP) and the EX-H30 (1/2.3") and A200 (APS-C) posses different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-H30 was unveiled 2 years after the A200 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-H30 being a Compact camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving into a thorough comparison, here is a concise summation of how the EX-H30 scores against the A200 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-H30 vs Sony A200 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H30 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-H30 Gallery and Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H30 over the Sony A200
| EX-H30 | A200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2011 | July 2008 | More modern by 31 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Casio EX-H30
| A200 | EX-H30 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H30 and Sony A200
| EX-H30 | A200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Casio EX-H30 vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-H30 comes with outside measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) whilst the Sony A200 has specifications of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") along with a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-H30 versus Sony A200 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you use at that moment. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-H30 and the A200.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H30 and A200 is 92 and 66 respectively.
Casio EX-H30 vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes just by reading technical specs. The image here should offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H30 and A200.
As you have seen, both of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The EX-H30 with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field trickier and the Casio EX-H30 will deliver greater detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more recent EX-H30 provides an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H30 vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-H30 vs Sony A200 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Sony |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2008-07-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Available lenses | - | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 201 gr (0.44 pounds) | 572 gr (1.26 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 63 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.3 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 521 |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | - | Compact Flash |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $709 | $100 |