Casio EX-H30 vs Sony WX220
92 Imaging
38 Features
40 Overall
38
96 Imaging
42 Features
41 Overall
41
Casio EX-H30 vs Sony WX220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 201g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 52 x 22mm
- Announced February 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-H30 vs Sony WX220 Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Casio EX-H30 and Sony WX220, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Casio and Sony. The image resolution of the EX-H30 (16MP) and the WX220 (18MP) is pretty comparable and they come with the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-H30 was launched 4 years earlier than the WX220 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-H30 being a Compact camera and the Sony WX220 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the EX-H30 scores against the WX220 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-H30 vs Sony WX220 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H30 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H30 Gallery and Sony WX220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H30 over the Sony WX220
| EX-H30 | WX220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony WX220 over the Casio EX-H30
| WX220 | EX-H30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 |  | January 2011 | More recent by 37 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H30 and Sony WX220
| EX-H30 | WX220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
Casio EX-H30 vs Sony WX220 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-H30 enjoys exterior measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) while the Sony WX220 has specifications of 92mm x 52mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9") and a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-H30 and Sony WX220 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-H30 versus the WX220.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H30 and WX220 is 92 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-H30 vs Sony WX220 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to picture the gap in sensor measurements just by seeing technical specs. The photograph here should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H30 and WX220.
As you have seen, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You should expect the Sony WX220 to show greater detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The older EX-H30 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H30 vs Sony WX220 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-H30 vs Sony WX220 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Sony |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2011-01-05 | 2014-02-12 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.70 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, on, slow synchro, off, advanced |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 201 grams (0.44 pounds) | 121 grams (0.27 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 92 x 52 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 210 photographs |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $709 | $198 |