Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus TG-320
96 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 36-108mm (F2.8-7.9) lens
- 111g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Announced January 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
Lets look closer at the Casio EX-S12 versus Olympus TG-320, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-S12 (12MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is fairly similar and both cameras posses the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-S12 was introduced 4 years earlier than the TG-320 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a full comparison, here is a simple view of how the EX-S12 matches up vs the TG-320 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-S12 & Olympus TG-320. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-S12 Gallery & Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S12 over the Olympus TG-320
| EX-S12 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Casio EX-S12
| TG-320 | EX-S12 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2012 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 36 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-S12 and Olympus TG-320
| EX-S12 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equal display sizing |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither comes with Touch display |
Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-S12 comes with exterior measurements of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-320 has measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-S12 versus Olympus TG-320 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-S12 compared to the TG-320.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S12 and TG-320 is 96 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes only by reviewing technical specs. The pic below may give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-S12 and TG-320.
As you can tell, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Olympus TG-320 to offer extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images more aggressively. The more aged EX-S12 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S12 | Olympus TG-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-S12 | Olympus TG-320 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-7.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/2 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.80 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 111g (0.24 lb) | 155g (0.34 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 150 images |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-60 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/ SDHC memory card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $119 | $0 |