Clicky

Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS

Portability
96
Imaging
35
Features
21
Overall
29
Casio Exilim EX-S12 front
 
Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS front
Portability
91
Imaging
36
Features
40
Overall
37

Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs

Casio EX-S12
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 36-108mm (F2.8-7.9) lens
  • 111g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
  • Introduced January 2009
Olympus TG-1 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
  • Introduced May 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview

Following is a in depth comparison of the Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-S12 (12MP) and the TG-1 iHS (12MP) is relatively comparable and they use the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The EX-S12 was brought out 4 years before the TG-1 iHS which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before going through a detailed comparison, below is a simple summation of how the EX-S12 matches up versus the TG-1 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-S12 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS

 EX-S12 TG-1 iHS 
Manually focus Very precise focusing

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Casio EX-S12

 TG-1 iHS EX-S12 
IntroducedMay 2012January 2009More modern by 40 months
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution610k230kClearer screen (+380k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-S12 and Olympus TG-1 iHS

 EX-S12 TG-1 iHS 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lack of Touch friendly screen

Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and size. The Casio EX-S12 provides exterior measurements of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-1 iHS has specifications of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).

See the Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-S12 and the TG-1 iHS.

Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-S12 and TG-1 iHS is 96 and 91 respectively.

Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizes just by seeing a spec sheet. The image underneath should provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-S12 and TG-1 iHS.

As you can see, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same megapixels so you can expect comparable quality of photographs however you should really consider the age of the cameras into account. The more aged EX-S12 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS sensor size comparison

Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-S12 Portrait photography features
Olympus TG-1 iHS Portrait photography features
27
has manual focus
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
megapixel count low (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
27
features face detect autofocus
lack of manual focus
manual mode not available
no external flash support
low resolution (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Casio EX-S12 Street photography factors
Olympus TG-1 iHS Street photography factors
55
lighter than competition in class (111 grams)
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
61
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
screen is fixed
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-S12 Sports photography details
Olympus TG-1 iHS Sports photography details
17
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
40
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features tracking focus
weather proofing
better than average battery pack (350 per charge)
slow frames per second (3.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
low resolution (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-S12 Travel photography features
Olympus TG-1 iHS Travel photography features
56
lighter than competition in class (111g)
flash built-in
does not have Timelapse mode
megapixel count low (12MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (36mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
68
better than average battery pack (350 shots)
weather proofing
has built in flash
relatively wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
no Timelapse mode
low resolution (12MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-S12 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus TG-1 iHS as a Landscape photography camera
28
has manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (36mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
no manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
does not have Timelapse mode
46
relatively wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
good sized screen (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
better than average battery pack (350 CIPA)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
manual mode not available
low resolution (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
no Timelapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-S12 Vlogging info
Olympus TG-1 iHS Vlogging info
25
lighter than competition in class (111 grams)
wide angle not good (36mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have external microphone port
36
relatively wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect autofocus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
no microphone port
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-S12 and Olympus TG-1 iHS
 Casio Exilim EX-S12Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS
General Information
Brand Casio Olympus
Model Casio Exilim EX-S12 Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS
Type Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Introduced 2009-01-08 2012-05-08
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic VI
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 4000 x 3000 3968 x 2976
Max native ISO 1600 6400
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 36-108mm (3.0x) 25-100mm (4.0x)
Max aperture f/2.8-7.9 f/2.0-4.9
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.7" 3"
Resolution of display 230k dot 610k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 1/2 secs 4 secs
Max shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed - 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) 1920 x 1080
Max video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 111g (0.24 lbs) 230g (0.51 lbs)
Dimensions 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 350 pictures
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery model NP-60 LI90B
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 and 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/ SDHC memory card, Internal -
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at release $119 $399