Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VG-160
96 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 36-108mm (F2.8-7.9) lens
- 111g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched January 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
Below is a comprehensive overview of the Casio EX-S12 versus Olympus VG-160, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by rivals Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-S12 (12MP) and the VG-160 (14MP) is very similar and they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-S12 was released 4 years prior to the VG-160 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a short view of how the EX-S12 matches up against the VG-160 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-S12 and Olympus VG-160. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-S12 Gallery and Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S12 over the Olympus VG-160
| EX-S12 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Casio EX-S12
| VG-160 | EX-S12 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 36 months |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Casio EX-S12 and Olympus VG-160
| EX-S12 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither offers Touch display |
Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-S12 offers external dimensions of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-160 has dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-S12 versus Olympus VG-160 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-S12 versus the VG-160.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S12 and VG-160 is 96 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to picture the contrast between sensor measurements purely by reviewing technical specs. The visual underneath will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-S12 and VG-160.
As you have seen, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You should expect to see the Olympus VG-160 to offer more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics much more aggressively. The older EX-S12 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S12 | Olympus VG-160 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S12 | Olympus VG-160 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2009-01-08 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-7.9 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 7cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/2s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.80 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 111 grams (0.24 pounds) | 125 grams (0.28 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 165 images |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-60 | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/ SDHC memory card, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $119 | $90 |