Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VR-320
96 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 36-108mm (F2.8-7.9) lens
- 111g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
- New Model is Olympus VR-330
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Below is a complete review of the Casio EX-S12 and Olympus VR-320, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-S12 (12MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is pretty similar and both cameras provide the same sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-S12 was revealed 3 years before the VR-320 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a concise summation of how the EX-S12 matches up versus the VR-320 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-S12 & Olympus VR-320. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-S12 Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S12 over the Olympus VR-320
| EX-S12 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Casio EX-S12
| VR-320 | EX-S12 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2011 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 30 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Casio EX-S12 and Olympus VR-320
| EX-S12 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera, you have to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-S12 provides outer dimensions of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
See the Casio EX-S12 and Olympus VR-320 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select during that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-S12 vs the VR-320.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S12 and VR-320 is 96 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to picture the gap between sensor measurements only by reading specifications. The photograph below will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S12 and VR-320.
To sum up, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You can expect the Olympus VR-320 to deliver more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures more aggressively. The older EX-S12 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S12 | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-S12 | Olympus VR-320 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-01-08 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-7.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/2s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 111g (0.24 lbs) | 158g (0.35 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-60 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/ SDHC memory card, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $119 | $179 |