Clicky

Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VR-330

Portability
96
Imaging
34
Features
21
Overall
28
Casio Exilim EX-S12 front
 
Olympus VR-330 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
38
Overall
37

Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs

Casio EX-S12
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 36-108mm (F2.8-7.9) lens
  • 111g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
  • Announced January 2009
Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Announced February 2011
  • Earlier Model is Olympus VR-320
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview

Let's look much closer at the Casio EX-S12 and Olympus VR-330, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-S12 (12MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is pretty comparable and they enjoy the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The EX-S12 was introduced 3 years prior to the VR-330 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before getting straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a short overview of how the EX-S12 matches up versus the VR-330 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

        

Reasons to pick Casio EX-S12 over the Olympus VR-330

 EX-S12 VR-330 
Focus manually Dial precise focus

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Casio EX-S12

 VR-330 EX-S12 
AnnouncedFebruary 2011January 2009More recent by 25 months
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kClearer screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-S12 and Olympus VR-330

 EX-S12 VR-330 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch screen No Touch screen

Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-S12 has physical measurements of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) and the Olympus VR-330 has measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

See the Casio EX-S12 and Olympus VR-330 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-S12 vs the VR-330.

Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VR-330 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S12 and VR-330 is 96 and 94 respectively.

Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VR-330 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is difficult to see the gap in sensor measurements only by checking out technical specs. The photograph here will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-S12 and VR-330.

As you can tell, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Olympus VR-330 to provide more detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The older EX-S12 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VR-330 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-S12 Portrait photography details
Olympus VR-330 Portrait photography details
27
focusing manually
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
MP count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
33
MP count good (14MP)
features face detection focusing
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Casio EX-S12 Street photography details
Olympus VR-330 Street photography details
55
lighter than average (111g)
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
62
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (158g)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-S12 Sports photography advice
Olympus VR-330 Sports photography advice
17
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
47
incredible zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14MP)
features tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Casio EX-S12
Travel photography with Olympus VR-330
56
lighter than average (111 grams)
has built in flash
missing Time Lapse recording
MP count low (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not fantastic (36mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
70
lighter than average (158g)
MP count good (14MP)
built-in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
very long zoom (300mm)
missing Timelapse function
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-S12 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus VR-330 as a Landscape photography camera
27
focusing manually
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (36mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
manual exposure not available
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
missing Time Lapse recording
42
relatively wide (24mm)
screen is a good size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
lack of manual exposure
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
missing Timelapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-S12 Vlogging info
Olympus VR-330 Vlogging info
25
lighter than average (111g)
wide angle not fantastic (36mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing external mic support
32
relatively wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection focusing
lighter than average (158 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing external microphone jack
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-S12 and Olympus VR-330
 Casio Exilim EX-S12Olympus VR-330
General Information
Make Casio Olympus
Model Casio Exilim EX-S12 Olympus VR-330
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2009-01-08 2011-02-08
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 4000 x 3000 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 1600 1600
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 36-108mm (3.0x) 24-300mm (12.5x)
Maximum aperture f/2.8-7.9 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.7" 3"
Display resolution 230k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Display tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 1/2s 4s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - 4.70 m
Flash options - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 111g (0.24 pounds) 158g (0.35 pounds)
Dimensions 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-60 LI-42B
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/ SDHC memory card, Internal SD/SDHC
Storage slots One One
Retail pricing $119 $220