Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VR-340
96 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 36-108mm (F2.8-7.9) lens
- 111g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched January 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VR-340 Overview
The following is a detailed assessment of the Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VR-340, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the EX-S12 (12MP) and VR-340 (16MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-S12 was manufactured 4 years prior to the VR-340 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a complete comparison, here is a short summary of how the EX-S12 matches up vs the VR-340 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VR-340 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-S12 and Olympus VR-340. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-S12 Gallery and Olympus VR-340 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S12 over the Olympus VR-340
| EX-S12 | VR-340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Casio EX-S12
| VR-340 | EX-S12 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 | January 2009 | Newer by 36 months | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S12 and Olympus VR-340
| EX-S12 | VR-340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Absent Touch screen |
Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-S12 comes with outside dimensions of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) and the Olympus VR-340 has dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VR-340 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-S12 and the VR-340.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-S12 and VR-340 is 96 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to picture the difference between sensor dimensions merely by reading through technical specs. The pic underneath will provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S12 and VR-340.
As you have seen, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You should expect the Olympus VR-340 to resolve more detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more aged EX-S12 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S12 | Olympus VR-340 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-S12 | Olympus VR-340 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-7.9 | f/3.0-5.7 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/2 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.80 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 111 grams (0.24 lb) | 125 grams (0.28 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-60 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/ SDHC memory card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $119 | $130 |