Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
96 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 36-108mm (F2.8-7.9) lens
- 111g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Casio EX-S12 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-S12 (12MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is fairly comparable but the EX-S12 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") provide totally different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-S12 was brought out 4 years earlier than the XZ-2 iHS which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short overview of how the EX-S12 matches up against the XZ-2 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-S12 & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-S12 Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S12 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| EX-S12 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Casio EX-S12
| XZ-2 iHS | EX-S12 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | December 2012 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 48 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-S12 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| EX-S12 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-S12 comes with outside measurements of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has specifications of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
See the Casio EX-S12 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-S12 and the XZ-2 iHS.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-S12 and XZ-2 iHS is 96 and 85 respectively.
Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to envision the difference in sensor sizes just by seeing technical specs. The image here will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-S12 and XZ-2 iHS.
As you can tell, the two cameras have the same MP but not the same sensor sizes. The EX-S12 includes the smaller sensor which will make achieving bokeh more difficult. The more aged EX-S12 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S12 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S12 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2012-12-18 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-7.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/2 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 111 grams (0.24 pounds) | 346 grams (0.76 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 216 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 shots |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-60 | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/ SDHC memory card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $119 | $450 |