Clicky

Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh GR

Portability
96
Imaging
35
Features
21
Overall
29
Casio Exilim EX-S12 front
 
Ricoh GR front
Portability
90
Imaging
58
Features
54
Overall
56

Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh GR Key Specs

Casio EX-S12
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 36-108mm (F2.8-7.9) lens
  • 111g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
  • Introduced January 2009
Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8) lens
  • 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
  • Launched April 2013
  • New Model is Ricoh GR II
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh GR Overview

Its time to look a little more closely at the Casio EX-S12 versus Ricoh GR, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Ricoh. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the EX-S12 (12MP) and GR (16MP) and the EX-S12 (1/2.3") and GR (APS-C) have different sensor sizing.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The EX-S12 was launched 5 years prior to the GR which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-S12 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before delving straight to a full comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the EX-S12 grades versus the GR when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-S12 over the Ricoh GR

 EX-S12 GR 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Casio EX-S12

 GR EX-S12 
LaunchedApril 2013January 2009More modern by 52 months
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1230k230kClearer display (+1000k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-S12 and Ricoh GR

 EX-S12 GR 
Focus manually Dial exact focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch display Missing Touch display

Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison

For those who are going to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-S12 features outer measurements of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) and the Ricoh GR has proportions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).

Analyze the Casio EX-S12 versus Ricoh GR in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is a front view size comparison of the EX-S12 versus the GR.

Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh GR size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S12 and GR is 96 and 90 respectively.

Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh GR top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes purely by checking specifications. The picture below may provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-S12 and GR.

To sum up, the 2 cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The EX-S12 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Ricoh GR will give greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged EX-S12 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh GR sensor size comparison

Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh GR Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Casio EX-S12
Portrait photography with Ricoh GR
27
focusing manually
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
low resolution (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
74
you can focus manually
above average flash sync speed (1/4,000s)
MP count decent (16MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Street photography with Casio EX-S12
Street photography with Ricoh GR
55
lighter than average in class (111g)
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
74
nice sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
lighter than competition (245 grams)
good high ISO (25,600)
fixed screen
no image stabilization
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Casio EX-S12
Sports photography with Ricoh GR
17
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
45
MP count decent (16MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
max fps very slow (4.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-S12 Travel photography advice
Ricoh GR Travel photography advice
56
lighter than average in class (111 grams)
flash built-in
missing Time Lapse recording
low resolution (12 megapixels)
does not contain selfie friendly display
wide angle not good (36mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
71
lighter than competition (245g)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Casio EX-S12
Landscape photography with Ricoh GR
28
focusing manually
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (36mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
small screen (2.7 inches)
lack of manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
missing Time Lapse recording
62
you can focus manually
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
MP count decent (16MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
good high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW formats
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-S12 as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh GR as a Vlogging camera
25
lighter than average in class (111 grams)
wide angle not good (36mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not contain selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing external mic jack
30
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition (245 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
no external microphone jack
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh GR Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-S12 and Ricoh GR
 Casio Exilim EX-S12Ricoh GR
General Information
Manufacturer Casio Ricoh
Model type Casio Exilim EX-S12 Ricoh GR
Category Small Sensor Compact Large Sensor Compact
Introduced 2009-01-08 2013-04-17
Body design Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.7 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 372.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Maximum resolution 4000 x 3000 4928 x 3264
Maximum native ISO 1600 25600
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 36-108mm (3.0x) 28mm (1x)
Maximal aperture f/2.8-7.9 f/2.8
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230k dot 1,230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen tech - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (optional)
Features
Lowest shutter speed 1/2s 300s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting speed - 4.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance - 5.40 m (at ISO 100)
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync - 1/4000s
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 111 grams (0.24 pounds) 245 grams (0.54 pounds)
Physical dimensions 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 78
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 23.6
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 13.5
DXO Low light rating not tested 972
Other
Battery life - 290 photographs
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-60 DB65
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/ SDHC memory card, Internal SD, SDHC, SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Launch cost $119 $971