Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh GR
96 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh GR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 36-108mm (F2.8-7.9) lens
- 111g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Launched April 2013
- New Model is Ricoh GR II
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh GR Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Casio EX-S12 versus Ricoh GR, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Ricoh. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the EX-S12 (12MP) and GR (16MP) and the EX-S12 (1/2.3") and GR (APS-C) have different sensor sizing.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-S12 was launched 5 years prior to the GR which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-S12 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a full comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the EX-S12 grades versus the GR when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh GR Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-S12 & Ricoh GR. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-S12 Gallery & Ricoh GR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S12 over the Ricoh GR
| EX-S12 | GR |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Casio EX-S12
| GR | EX-S12 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | April 2013 | January 2009 | More modern by 52 months | |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 1230k | 230k | Clearer display (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S12 and Ricoh GR
| EX-S12 | GR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-S12 features outer measurements of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) and the Ricoh GR has proportions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-S12 versus Ricoh GR in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is a front view size comparison of the EX-S12 versus the GR.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S12 and GR is 96 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes purely by checking specifications. The picture below may provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-S12 and GR.
To sum up, the 2 cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The EX-S12 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Ricoh GR will give greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged EX-S12 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh GR Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S12 | Ricoh GR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S12 | Ricoh GR |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2013-04-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4928 x 3264 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-7.9 | f/2.8 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 1,230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/2s | 300s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 4.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/4000s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 111 grams (0.24 pounds) | 245 grams (0.54 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 78 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 972 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 290 photographs |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-60 | DB65 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/ SDHC memory card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $119 | $971 |