Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS
96 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
90 Imaging
41 Features
44 Overall
42
Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 36-108mm (F2.8-7.9) lens
- 111g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Launched February 2015
- Superseded the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Successor is Ricoh WG-6
Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview
Following is a extensive assessment of the Casio EX-S12 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Ricoh. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-S12 (12MP) and WG-5 GPS (16MP) but they use the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-S12 was announced 7 years earlier than the WG-5 GPS which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a thorough comparison, below is a simple summary of how the EX-S12 matches up against the WG-5 GPS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-S12 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-S12 Gallery and Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S12 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
EX-S12 | WG-5 GPS |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Casio EX-S12
WG-5 GPS | EX-S12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2015 | January 2009 | More modern by 74 months | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S12 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
EX-S12 | WG-5 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera, you have to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-S12 comes with external dimensions of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has specifications of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-S12 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you select during that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-S12 against the WG-5 GPS.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S12 and WG-5 GPS is 96 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to imagine the difference in sensor sizes only by going through specs. The image underneath should give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S12 and WG-5 GPS.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to provide extra detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-S12 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S12 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S12 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2015-02-10 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-7.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1/2 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 14.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | - | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 111g (0.24 pounds) | 236g (0.52 pounds) |
Dimensions | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 pictures |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-60 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/ SDHC memory card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $119 | $500 |