Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh WG-M1
96 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 36-108mm (F2.8-7.9) lens
- 111g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Announced September 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Casio EX-S12 and Ricoh WG-M1, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-S12 (12MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is relatively close and both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-S12 was manufactured 6 years before the WG-M1 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a complete comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the EX-S12 grades versus the WG-M1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-S12 & Ricoh WG-M1. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-S12 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S12 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| EX-S12 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Clearer screen (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Casio EX-S12
| WG-M1 | EX-S12 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2014 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 69 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-S12 and Ricoh WG-M1
| EX-S12 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-S12 offers external dimensions of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-M1 has sizing of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-S12 and Ricoh WG-M1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-S12 and the WG-M1.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S12 and WG-M1 is 96 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to see the difference in sensor sizing simply by looking through specifications. The visual here should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S12 and WG-M1.
Plainly, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Ricoh WG-M1 to provide you with extra detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older EX-S12 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S12 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-S12 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-01-08 | 2014-09-12 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | (1×) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-7.9 | f/2.8 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7" | 1.5" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 115k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/2 seconds | - |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | - | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 111g (0.24 lb) | 190g (0.42 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 shots |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-60 | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/ SDHC memory card, Internal | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $119 | $2,000 |