Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh WG-M1
96 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 36-108mm (F2.8-7.9) lens
- 111g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Announced September 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Casio EX-S12 and Ricoh WG-M1, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-S12 (12MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is relatively close and both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-S12 was manufactured 6 years before the WG-M1 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a complete comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the EX-S12 grades versus the WG-M1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-S12 & Ricoh WG-M1. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-S12 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S12 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| EX-S12 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Clearer screen (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Casio EX-S12
| WG-M1 | EX-S12 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2014 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 69 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-S12 and Ricoh WG-M1
| EX-S12 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-S12 offers external dimensions of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-M1 has sizing of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-S12 and Ricoh WG-M1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-S12 and the WG-M1.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S12 and WG-M1 is 96 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to see the difference in sensor sizing simply by looking through specifications. The visual here should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S12 and WG-M1.
Plainly, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Ricoh WG-M1 to provide you with extra detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older EX-S12 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S12 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-S12 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-01-08 | 2014-09-12 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | (1×) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-7.9 | f/2.8 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7" | 1.5" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 115k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/2 seconds | - |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | - | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 111g (0.24 lb) | 190g (0.42 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 shots |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-60 | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/ SDHC memory card, Internal | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $119 | $2,000 |