Casio EX-S12 vs Samsung MV800
96 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
97 Imaging
38 Features
43 Overall
40
Casio EX-S12 vs Samsung MV800 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 36-108mm (F2.8-7.9) lens
- 111g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 56 x 10mm
- Announced September 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-S12 vs Samsung MV800 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Casio EX-S12 vs Samsung MV800, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Casio and Samsung. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the EX-S12 (12MP) and MV800 (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-S12 was unveiled 3 years before the MV800 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a full comparison, here is a concise summation of how the EX-S12 matches up versus the MV800 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-S12 vs Samsung MV800 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-S12 & Samsung MV800. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-S12 Gallery & Samsung MV800 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S12 over the Samsung MV800
| EX-S12 | MV800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung MV800 over the Casio EX-S12
| MV800 | EX-S12 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2011 | January 2009 | Newer by 32 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-S12 and Samsung MV800
| EX-S12 | MV800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Casio EX-S12 vs Samsung MV800 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-S12 offers physical dimensions of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) while the Samsung MV800 has measurements of 92mm x 56mm x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-S12 vs Samsung MV800 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached during that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the EX-S12 compared to the MV800.

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S12 and MV800 is 96 and 97 respectively.
Casio EX-S12 vs Samsung MV800 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to picture the difference in sensor dimensions simply by seeing specifications. The picture here will give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S12 and MV800.
To sum up, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You can expect the Samsung MV800 to produce more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-S12 will be behind in sensor tech.
Casio EX-S12 vs Samsung MV800 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-S12 vs Samsung MV800 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S12 | Samsung MV800 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S12 | Samsung MV800 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2009-01-08 | 2011-09-01 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-7.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/2 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.20 m |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320 x 240 (30/15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 111 grams (0.24 lb) | 121 grams (0.27 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 92 x 56 x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-60 | BP70 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/ SDHC memory card, Internal | Micro SD |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $119 | $499 |