Casio EX-S12 vs Samsung ST600
96 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28


95 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
Casio EX-S12 vs Samsung ST600 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 36-108mm (F2.8-7.9) lens
- 111g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-135mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 150g - 104 x 60 x 20mm
- Announced January 2010

Casio EX-S12 vs Samsung ST600 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Casio EX-S12 vs Samsung ST600, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-S12 (12MP) and the ST600 (14MP) is relatively well matched and they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

The EX-S12 was announced 12 months prior to the ST600 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-S12 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST600 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going through a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple view of how the EX-S12 grades against the ST600 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Casio EX-S12 vs Samsung ST600 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-S12 and Samsung ST600. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-S12 Gallery and Samsung ST600 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S12 over the Samsung ST600
EX-S12 | ST600 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST600 over the Casio EX-S12
ST600 | EX-S12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2010 | ![]() | January 2009 | More recent by 12 months |
Screen dimension | 3.5" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
Screen resolution | 1152k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+922k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-S12 and Samsung ST600
EX-S12 | ST600 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Casio EX-S12 vs Samsung ST600 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-S12 comes with outside measurements of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) while the Samsung ST600 has sizing of 104mm x 60mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-S12 vs Samsung ST600 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose during that time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-S12 compared to the ST600.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-S12 and ST600 is 96 and 95 respectively.

Casio EX-S12 vs Samsung ST600 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to picture the contrast between sensor measurements simply by looking at technical specs. The graphic underneath will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-S12 and ST600.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You should count on the Samsung ST600 to give more detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots much more aggressively. The older EX-S12 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-S12 vs Samsung ST600 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-S12 vs Samsung ST600 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S12 | Samsung ST600 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-S12 | Samsung ST600 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Released | 2009-01-08 | 2010-01-06 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 4800 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 27-135mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-7.9 | f/3.3-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3.5 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 1,152k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/2s | 8s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.00 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 111 grams (0.24 lbs) | 150 grams (0.33 lbs) |
Dimensions | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 104 x 60 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-60 | SLB07 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/ SDHC memory card, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $119 | $330 |