Casio EX-S12 vs Samsung WB850F
96 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
91 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Casio EX-S12 vs Samsung WB850F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 36-108mm (F2.8-7.9) lens
- 111g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 250g - 109 x 62 x 25mm
- Announced January 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-S12 vs Samsung WB850F Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-S12 and Samsung WB850F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and Samsung. There is a significant difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-S12 (12MP) and WB850F (16MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-S12 was introduced 4 years prior to the WB850F which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick summary of how the EX-S12 matches up vs the WB850F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-S12 vs Samsung WB850F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-S12 and Samsung WB850F. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-S12 Gallery and Samsung WB850F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S12 over the Samsung WB850F
| EX-S12 | WB850F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB850F over the Casio EX-S12
| WB850F | EX-S12 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2012 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 36 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 614k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S12 and Samsung WB850F
| EX-S12 | WB850F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-S12 vs Samsung WB850F Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-S12 comes with exterior measurements of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB850F has sizing of 109mm x 62mm x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") having a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
See the Casio EX-S12 and Samsung WB850F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-S12 vs the WB850F.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S12 and WB850F is 96 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-S12 vs Samsung WB850F Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to visualize the gap in sensor sizes only by researching specs. The image here may give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-S12 and WB850F.
All in all, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You should expect the Samsung WB850F to provide you with greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-S12 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-S12 vs Samsung WB850F Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-S12 vs Samsung WB850F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S12 | Samsung WB850F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S12 | Samsung WB850F |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2012-01-09 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-7.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 614k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | - | AMOLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/2s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 111 grams (0.24 pounds) | 250 grams (0.55 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 109 x 62 x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-60 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/ SDHC memory card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $119 | $599 |