Clicky

Casio EX-S12 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro

Portability
96
Imaging
34
Features
21
Overall
28
Casio Exilim EX-S12 front
 
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
Portability
70
Imaging
63
Features
38
Overall
53

Casio EX-S12 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs

Casio EX-S12
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 36-108mm (F2.8-7.9) lens
  • 111g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
  • Released January 2009
Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Introduced February 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-S12 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview

The following is a extensive overview of the Casio EX-S12 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Sigma. There is a substantial difference among the resolutions of the EX-S12 (12MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the EX-S12 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) boast different sensor sizing.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The EX-S12 was manufactured 6 years earlier than the DP2 Quattro which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-S12 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before getting right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple overview of how the EX-S12 scores against the DP2 Quattro in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-S12 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 EX-S12 DP2 Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Casio EX-S12

 DP2 Quattro EX-S12 
IntroducedFebruary 2014January 2009Newer by 62 months
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution920k230kCrisper screen (+690k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-S12 and Sigma DP2 Quattro

 EX-S12 DP2 Quattro 
Manually focus Dial accurate focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Missing Touch friendly screen

Casio EX-S12 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison

If you're intending to travel with your camera often, you will need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-S12 offers outer measurements of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP2 Quattro has proportions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") having a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).

Check out the Casio EX-S12 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-S12 against the DP2 Quattro.

Casio EX-S12 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S12 and DP2 Quattro is 96 and 70 respectively.

Casio EX-S12 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-S12 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is difficult to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by seeing a spec sheet. The pic here will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-S12 and DP2 Quattro.

Clearly, both of those cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The EX-S12 because of its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF trickier and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will show more detail due to its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged EX-S12 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-S12 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison

Casio EX-S12 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-S12 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-S12 Portrait photography info
Sigma DP2 Quattro Portrait photography info
27
you can focus manually
no manual control
external flash not possible
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
77
focusing manually
MP count decent (20MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
provides face detection focus
delivers RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Street photography with Casio EX-S12
Street photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
55
lighter than competition (111g)
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
61
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Casio EX-S12
Sports photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
17
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
48
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
can't change focal length (45mm)
max fps very slow (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
has no phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-S12 as a Travel photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Travel photography camera
56
lighter than competition (111 grams)
has built in flash
missing Time Lapse function
resolution not great (12MP)
does not have selfie friendly display
wide angle not the best (36mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
53
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
does not have selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-S12 Landscape photography details
Sigma DP2 Quattro Landscape photography details
27
you can focus manually
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (36mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
missing Time Lapse function
59
focusing manually
screen size is decent (3 inches)
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (45mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-S12 Vlogging info
Sigma DP2 Quattro Vlogging info
25
lighter than competition (111g)
wide angle not the best (36mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not have selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing external mic port
9
no video shooting
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Casio EX-S12 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-S12 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
 Casio Exilim EX-S12Sigma DP2 Quattro
General Information
Brand Name Casio Sigma
Model Casio Exilim EX-S12 Sigma DP2 Quattro
Class Small Sensor Compact Large Sensor Compact
Released 2009-01-08 2014-02-13
Body design Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - TRUE III engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 20MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4000 x 3000 5424 x 3616
Highest native ISO 1600 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 36-108mm (3.0x) 45mm (1x)
Largest aperture f/2.8-7.9 f/2.8
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen tech - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 1/2s 30s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter speed - 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - no built-in flash
Flash options - no built-in flash
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) -
Highest video resolution 1280x720 None
Video format Motion JPEG -
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 111 gr (0.24 lb) 395 gr (0.87 lb)
Physical dimensions 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-60 BP-51
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/ SDHC memory card, Internal -
Storage slots Single Single
Launch price $119 $931