Casio EX-S12 vs Sony A3000
96 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/56350/5635047d95360cba2b2374bc88101a4d9aaf0be8" alt="Casio Exilim EX-S12 front Casio Exilim EX-S12 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5aaf5/5aaf587e29a179629037a7974702d099625cbb1e" alt="Sony Alpha A3000 front Sony Alpha A3000 front"
69 Imaging
62 Features
54 Overall
58
Casio EX-S12 vs Sony A3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 36-108mm (F2.8-7.9) lens
- 111g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 411g - 128 x 91 x 85mm
- Announced August 2013
- New Model is Sony a3500
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Casio EX-S12 vs Sony A3000 Overview
Below is a extended comparison of the Casio EX-S12 versus Sony A3000, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Casio and Sony. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-S12 (12MP) and A3000 (20MP) and the EX-S12 (1/2.3") and A3000 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The EX-S12 was manufactured 5 years prior to the A3000 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-S12 being a Compact camera and the Sony A3000 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before going into a full comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the EX-S12 grades against the A3000 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Casio EX-S12 vs Sony A3000 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-S12 & Sony Alpha A3000. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-S12 Gallery & Sony A3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S12 over the Sony A3000
EX-S12 | A3000 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A3000 over the Casio EX-S12
A3000 | EX-S12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2013 | ![]() | January 2009 | More recent by 56 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Casio EX-S12 and Sony A3000
EX-S12 | A3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-S12 vs Sony A3000 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-S12 provides outside measurements of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) and the Sony A3000 has measurements of 128mm x 91mm x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") and a weight of 411 grams (0.91 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-S12 versus Sony A3000 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-S12 versus the A3000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8fcc3/8fcc3e3acb4081df655e9f12c8557309c76a73d8" alt="Casio EX-S12 vs Sony A3000 size comparison Casio EX-S12 vs Sony A3000 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S12 and A3000 is 96 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2c8d/f2c8db71f389aa96114bdddfa2b7cae4e2b0380e" alt="Casio EX-S12 vs Sony A3000 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-S12 vs Sony A3000 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-S12 vs Sony A3000 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to envision the contrast in sensor measurements purely by researching specs. The visual underneath will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-S12 and A3000.
All in all, each of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The EX-S12 because of its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field harder and the Sony A3000 will provide you with extra detail due to its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older EX-S12 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f96f1/f96f12cc24c5675115228d7146d30bd70a8816a0" alt="Casio EX-S12 vs Sony A3000 sensor size comparison Casio EX-S12 vs Sony A3000 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-S12 vs Sony A3000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1cb9f/1cb9ff1423e7b595e0c2466a127ac3c5bf7cbeaa" alt="Casio EX-S12 vs Sony A3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-S12 vs Sony A3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Casio EX-S12 vs Sony A3000 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S12 | Sony Alpha A3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Sony |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S12 | Sony Alpha A3000 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2013-08-27 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | BIONZ image |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5456 x 3632 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 16000 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-7.9 | - |
Available lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.47x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/2 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 6.00 m (at ISO200 / 4m at ISO100) |
Flash settings | - | Flash off, Auto flash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync. |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD, H.264, MP4 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 111 gr (0.24 lb) | 411 gr (0.91 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 128 x 91 x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 78 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.8 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1068 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 470 pictures |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-60 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2-sec. or 10-sec. delay) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/ SDHC memory card, Internal | - |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $119 | $398 |