Casio EX-S12 vs Sony A900
96 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
54 Imaging
66 Features
62 Overall
64
Casio EX-S12 vs Sony A900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 36-108mm (F2.8-7.9) lens
- 111g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 895g - 156 x 117 x 82mm
- Announced October 2008
- Newer Model is Sony A99
Casio EX-S12 vs Sony A900 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Casio EX-S12 versus Sony A900, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Casio and Sony. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-S12 (12MP) and A900 (25MP) and the EX-S12 (1/2.3") and A900 (Full frame) provide totally different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-S12 was brought out 3 months later than the A900 so they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-S12 being a Compact camera and the Sony A900 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise summary of how the EX-S12 matches up against the A900 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-S12 vs Sony A900 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-S12 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A900. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-S12 Gallery & Sony A900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S12 over the Sony A900
EX-S12 | A900 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A900 over the Casio EX-S12
A900 | EX-S12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Sharper display (+692k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S12 and Sony A900
EX-S12 | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2009 | October 2008 | Same age | |
Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-S12 vs Sony A900 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-S12 comes with outer measurements of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) whilst the Sony A900 has proportions of 156mm x 117mm x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-S12 versus Sony A900 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-S12 and the A900.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S12 and A900 is 96 and 54 respectively.
Casio EX-S12 vs Sony A900 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to envision the contrast in sensor measurements only by viewing specs. The graphic here will provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-S12 and A900.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The EX-S12 because of its smaller sensor will make achieving bokeh more challenging and the Sony A900 will provide you with greater detail having its extra 13 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images way more aggressively.
Casio EX-S12 vs Sony A900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-S12 vs Sony A900 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S12 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Sony |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S12 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Released | 2009-01-08 | 2008-10-22 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 25 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 6048 x 4032 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-7.9 | - |
Total lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Xtra Fine color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/2 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 111 gr (0.24 pounds) | 895 gr (1.97 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 156 x 117 x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 79 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1431 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 880 pictures |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-60 | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/ SDHC memory card, Internal | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
Card slots | Single | Two |
Launch price | $119 | $2,736 |