Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-Z2000
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-Z2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Released August 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-Z2000 Overview
Following is a detailed overview of the Casio EX-S200 versus Casio EX-Z2000, both Ultracompact digital cameras and both are created by Casio. The sensor resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the EX-Z2000 (14MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras offer the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-S200 was brought out 7 months after the EX-Z2000 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before getting into a thorough comparison, here is a short summation of how the EX-S200 matches up against the EX-Z2000 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-S200 and Casio Exilim EX-Z2000. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-S200 Gallery and Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Casio EX-Z2000
| EX-S200 | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2010 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 7 months |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Casio EX-S200
| EX-Z2000 | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Casio EX-Z2000
| EX-S200 | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-Z2000 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera, you need to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-S200 enjoys outside dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Casio EX-Z2000 has sizing of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-S200 versus Casio EX-Z2000 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you choose at that moment. Here is a front view scale comparison of the EX-S200 vs the EX-Z2000.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-S200 and EX-Z2000 is 96 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-Z2000 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes purely by checking technical specs. The image below may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S200 and EX-Z2000.
As you have seen, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same resolution therefore you should expect similar quality of files however you would want to take the production date of the products into consideration. The fresher EX-S200 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-Z2000 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-Z2000 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Casio |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2010-08-03 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 50 | 64 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 461 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 132 grams (0.29 lbs) | 152 grams (0.34 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-120 | NP-110 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $0 | $0 |