Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-Z33
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
97 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-Z33 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Launched August 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 106g - 95 x 56 x 18mm
- Introduced August 2009
Photography Glossary Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-Z33 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-S200 and Casio EX-Z33, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both offered by Casio. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the EX-S200 (14MP) and EX-Z33 (10MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-S200 was launched 12 months later than the EX-Z33 and they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Casio EX-Z33 being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick summation of how the EX-S200 scores against the EX-Z33 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-Z33 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-S200 and Casio Exilim EX-Z33. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-S200 Gallery and Casio EX-Z33 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Casio EX-Z33
| EX-S200 | EX-Z33 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2010 |  | August 2009 | More recent by 12 months |
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z33 over the Casio EX-S200
| EX-Z33 | EX-S200 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Casio EX-Z33
| EX-S200 | EX-Z33 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither contains Touch screen |
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-Z33 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-S200 has got exterior dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Casio EX-Z33 has proportions of 95mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 106 grams (0.23 lbs).
See the Casio EX-S200 and Casio EX-Z33 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the EX-S200 and the EX-Z33.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and EX-Z33 is 96 and 97 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-Z33 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to picture the contrast in sensor measurements only by seeing specifications. The visual here might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S200 and EX-Z33.
To sum up, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Casio EX-S200 to show more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures more aggressively. The younger EX-S200 provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-Z33 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-Z33 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Casio |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Casio Exilim EX-Z33 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2010-08-03 | 2009-08-31 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 50 | 64 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 36-107mm (3.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7" | 2.5" |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 2.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 132 gr (0.29 lb) | 106 gr (0.23 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 95 x 56 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-120 | NP-82 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $0 | $120 |