Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-ZR1000
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
90 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-ZR1000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Introduced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Released September 2012
Photography Glossary Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-ZR1000 Overview
Below, we are looking at the Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-ZR1000, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are built by Casio. The image resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) is very well matched and they possess the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-S200 was manufactured 3 years before the EX-ZR1000 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Casio EX-ZR1000 being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the EX-S200 scores against the EX-ZR1000 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Casio EX-ZR1000
| EX-S200 | EX-ZR1000 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Casio EX-S200
| EX-ZR1000 | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2012 |  | August 2010 | More recent by 26 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Casio EX-ZR1000
| EX-S200 | EX-ZR1000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither offers Touch display |
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-ZR1000 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-S200 offers external dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Casio EX-ZR1000 has specifications of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") having a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-ZR1000 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-S200 versus the EX-ZR1000.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and EX-ZR1000 is 96 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-ZR1000 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to see the difference between sensor measurements only by looking at technical specs. The photograph underneath should provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S200 and EX-ZR1000.
As you can tell, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Casio EX-ZR1000 to resolve greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos much more aggressively. The older EX-S200 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-ZR1000 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-ZR1000 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Casio |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2010-08-03 | 2012-09-25 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | EXILIM Engine HS 3 |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 50 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 461 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | - | Super Clear TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 132g (0.29 lbs) | 255g (0.56 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 470 shots |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-120 | NP-130 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $0 | $572 |
