Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-ZR15
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-ZR15 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Revealed August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Released January 2012
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-ZR15 Overview
Following is a detailed analysis of the Casio EX-S200 versus Casio EX-ZR15, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both are manufactured by Casio. The resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the EX-ZR15 (16MP) is relatively close and they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-S200 was announced 17 months before the EX-ZR15 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Casio EX-ZR15 being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a full comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the EX-S200 scores against the EX-ZR15 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-S200 and Casio Exilim EX-ZR15. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-S200 Gallery and Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Casio EX-ZR15
EX-S200 | EX-ZR15 |
---|
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Casio EX-S200
EX-ZR15 | EX-S200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2012 | August 2010 | More modern by 17 months | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Casio EX-ZR15
EX-S200 | EX-ZR15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither provides Touch screen |
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-ZR15 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-S200 provides physical measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Casio EX-ZR15 has measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-S200 versus Casio EX-ZR15 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-S200 vs the EX-ZR15.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-S200 and EX-ZR15 is 96 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-ZR15 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to picture the difference in sensor sizes simply by researching technical specs. The pic underneath will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-S200 and EX-ZR15.
As you have seen, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You should count on the Casio EX-ZR15 to provide you with more detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more aged EX-S200 will be behind in sensor technology.
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-ZR15 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-ZR15 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Casio |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 |
Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2010-08-03 | 2012-01-09 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | Exilim Engine 5.0 |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 50 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 28-196mm (7.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 2cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 461 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | Super Clear TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 5.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 132 gr (0.29 lbs) | 176 gr (0.39 lbs) |
Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 325 photos |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-120 | NP-110 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $0 | $249 |