Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-ZR700
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3819e/3819e71e05320e4850adef6a9b1c035b77326b01" alt="Casio Exilim EX-S200 front Casio Exilim EX-S200 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c919/1c9190b66ae9d20e63ea1a028964e79ad2a5586f" alt="Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 front Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 front"
91 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-ZR700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Announced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-ZR700 Overview
Below is a in-depth analysis of the Casio EX-S200 versus Casio EX-ZR700, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both built by Casio. The sensor resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the EX-ZR700 (16MP) is fairly similar and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The EX-S200 was revealed 3 years before the EX-ZR700 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Casio EX-ZR700 being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a full comparison, here is a brief summation of how the EX-S200 matches up against the EX-ZR700 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Casio Exilim EX-ZR700. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Casio EX-ZR700
EX-S200 | EX-ZR700 |
---|
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Casio EX-S200
EX-ZR700 | EX-S200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | ![]() | August 2010 | More recent by 30 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+692k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Casio EX-ZR700
EX-S200 | EX-ZR700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-ZR700 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-S200 enjoys physical measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Casio EX-ZR700 has proportions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-S200 versus Casio EX-ZR700 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-S200 versus the EX-ZR700.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/463fb/463fbab7f075da4edc29ef03aeb37e2126cfba0e" alt="Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-ZR700 size comparison Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-ZR700 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and EX-ZR700 is 96 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9c47/e9c47f8afc6b7724c01df61f1c848791704e6002" alt="Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-ZR700 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-ZR700 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-ZR700 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to visualise the gap between sensor measurements merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The visual here will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-S200 and EX-ZR700.
Clearly, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Casio EX-ZR700 to offer greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-S200 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c7f1/8c7f185e37145f5b42834ac4138bb22848aae431" alt="Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-ZR700 sensor size comparison Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-ZR700 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-ZR700 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de726/de72659b71cfdf8efab32f4638b97b9b56cc0bc7" alt="Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-ZR700 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-ZR700 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Casio EX-S200 vs Casio EX-ZR700 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Casio |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 |
Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2010-08-03 | 2013-01-29 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | EXILIM Engine HS 3 |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 50 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 25-450mm (18.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | - | Super Clear TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.70 m |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 132g (0.29 pounds) | 222g (0.49 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 470 photographs |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-120 | NP-130 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $0 | $370 |