Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm JX370
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3819e/3819e71e05320e4850adef6a9b1c035b77326b01" alt="Casio Exilim EX-S200 front Casio Exilim EX-S200 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5939e/5939ef01a64739b89f404e230b211b1d75d44582" alt="Fujifilm FinePix JX370 front Fujifilm FinePix JX370 front"
95 Imaging
37 Features
22 Overall
31
Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm JX370 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Released August 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.6-6.2) lens
- 124g - 95 x 57 x 24mm
- Introduced August 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm JX370 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-S200 versus Fujifilm JX370, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and FujiFilm. The resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the Fujifilm JX370 (14MP) is relatively comparable and they use the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The EX-S200 was manufactured 12 months earlier than the Fujifilm JX370 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Fujifilm JX370 being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the EX-S200 grades vs the Fujifilm JX370 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm JX370 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-S200 and Fujifilm FinePix JX370. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-S200 Gallery and Fujifilm JX370 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Fujifilm JX370
EX-S200 | Fujifilm JX370 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm JX370 over the Casio EX-S200
Fujifilm JX370 | EX-S200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2011 | ![]() | August 2010 | Newer by 12 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Fujifilm JX370
EX-S200 | Fujifilm JX370 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | No Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm JX370 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-S200 has outer dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm JX370 has proportions of 95mm x 57mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-S200 versus Fujifilm JX370 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are using at that moment. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-S200 vs the Fujifilm JX370.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9b68f/9b68f563816375c6dee74c4df9a3b3e0bcf8d9ed" alt="Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm JX370 size comparison Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm JX370 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S200 and Fujifilm JX370 is 96 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9c0f3/9c0f3356f61cc518dee84834b3be8323ba33fe91" alt="Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm JX370 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm JX370 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm JX370 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions purely by going through specs. The pic below may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-S200 and Fujifilm JX370.
All in all, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same resolution therefore you should expect comparable quality of images however you will want to factor the release date of the cameras into account. The more aged EX-S200 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eff0d/eff0dfc46b0f570ca9929ee1b4dbcf37fffa71b5" alt="Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm JX370 sensor size comparison Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm JX370 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm JX370 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7edf4/7edf41edc3a1ff88d075eb53e677157ede6edcf9" alt="Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm JX370 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm JX370 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm JX370 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Fujifilm FinePix JX370 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | FujiFilm |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Fujifilm FinePix JX370 |
Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2010-08-03 | 2011-08-11 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 50 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.6-6.2 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1800s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 132g (0.29 lb) | 124g (0.27 lb) |
Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 95 x 57 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 190 photos |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-120 | NP-45A |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD / SDHC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $0 | $159 |