Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm JZ200
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
95 Imaging
39 Features
30 Overall
35
Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm JZ200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Released August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 135g - 100 x 56 x 24mm
- Launched January 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm JZ200 Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm JZ200, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and FujiFilm. The resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the Fujifilm JZ200 (16MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-S200 was released 17 months earlier than the Fujifilm JZ200 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Fujifilm JZ200 being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple view of how the EX-S200 grades versus the Fujifilm JZ200 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm JZ200 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Fujifilm FinePix JZ200. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Fujifilm JZ200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Fujifilm JZ200
| EX-S200 | Fujifilm JZ200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm JZ200 over the Casio EX-S200
| Fujifilm JZ200 | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 |  | August 2010 | Fresher by 17 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Fujifilm JZ200
| EX-S200 | Fujifilm JZ200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | No Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm JZ200 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you will have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-S200 provides outer measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm JZ200 has dimensions of 100mm x 56mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm JZ200 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using during that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the EX-S200 compared to the Fujifilm JZ200.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S200 and Fujifilm JZ200 is 96 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm JZ200 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizing only by looking at a spec sheet. The photograph underneath might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-S200 and Fujifilm JZ200.
Clearly, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You can count on the Fujifilm JZ200 to give you extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs more aggressively. The older EX-S200 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm JZ200 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm JZ200 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2010-08-03 | 2012-01-05 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 50 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 25-200mm (8.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 2.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 132 grams (0.29 pounds) | 135 grams (0.30 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 100 x 56 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-120 | NP-45A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $0 | $0 |