Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1
96 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
90 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Introduced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 260g - 124 x 68 x 26mm
- Released July 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Casio EX-S200 versus Fujifilm Real 3D W1, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and FujiFilm. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-S200 (14MP) and Fujifilm Real 3D W1 (10MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-S200 was unveiled 13 months later than the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the EX-S200 grades against the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Fujifilm Real 3D W1
| EX-S200 | Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2010 | July 2009 | Fresher by 13 months | |
| Manually focus | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W1 over the Casio EX-S200
| Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 2.8" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.1") |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Fujifilm Real 3D W1
| EX-S200 | Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither includes Touch screen |
Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-S200 features external measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 has proportions of 124mm x 68mm x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 260 grams (0.57 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-S200 versus Fujifilm Real 3D W1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-S200 against the Fujifilm Real 3D W1.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S200 and Fujifilm Real 3D W1 is 96 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to envision the difference in sensor sizing only by going through technical specs. The visual underneath will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-S200 and Fujifilm Real 3D W1.
As you can tell, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Casio EX-S200 to show more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The fresher EX-S200 is going to have a benefit in sensor technology.
Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2010-08-03 | 2009-07-22 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | RP (Real Photo) 3D |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 50 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.7-4.2 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 8cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 2.8" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 1/4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.60 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 132g (0.29 lbs) | 260g (0.57 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 124 x 68 x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-120 | NP-95 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $0 | $900 |