Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3
96 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
90 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Revealed August 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 230g - 124 x 66 x 28mm
- Introduced August 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Overview
Below is a detailed comparison of the Casio EX-S200 versus Fujifilm Real 3D W3, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and FujiFilm. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-S200 (14MP) and Fujifilm Real 3D W3 (10MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-S200 was announced very close to the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a full comparison, here is a short highlight of how the EX-S200 scores against the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-S200 and Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-S200 Gallery and Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Fujifilm Real 3D W3
| EX-S200 | Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W3 over the Casio EX-S200
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
| Screen resolution | 1150k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+920k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Fujifilm Real 3D W3
| EX-S200 | Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2010 |  | August 2010 | Same generation |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-S200 has got external dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 has proportions of 124mm x 66mm x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-S200 versus Fujifilm Real 3D W3 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-S200 versus the Fujifilm Real 3D W3.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S200 and Fujifilm Real 3D W3 is 96 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements purely by checking out specs. The visual underneath may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S200 and Fujifilm Real 3D W3.
All in all, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You should expect the Casio EX-S200 to provide extra detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs more aggressively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2010-08-03 | 2010-08-17 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | 3D RP(Real Photo) HD |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 50 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.7-4.2 |
| Macro focus range | - | 8cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 1,150k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 1/4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 132g (0.29 lbs) | 230g (0.51 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 124 x 66 x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-120 | NP-50 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $0 | $900 |