Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm S2 Pro
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3819e/3819e71e05320e4850adef6a9b1c035b77326b01" alt="Casio Exilim EX-S200 front Casio Exilim EX-S200 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7551/b7551c063f2f343a3761c1b6f514fbe7856fb69c" alt="Fujifilm FinePix S2 Pro front Fujifilm FinePix S2 Pro front"
56 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm S2 Pro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Revealed August 2010
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Nikon F Mount
- 850g - 142 x 131 x 80mm
- Released August 2002
- Superseded the Fujifilm S1 Pro
- Updated by Fujifilm S3 Pro
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm S2 Pro Overview
Here, we are comparing the Casio EX-S200 versus Fujifilm S2 Pro, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Pro DSLR by competitors Casio and FujiFilm. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-S200 (14MP) and Fujifilm S2 Pro (6MP) and the EX-S200 (1/2.3") and Fujifilm S2 Pro (APS-C) posses different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The EX-S200 was introduced 8 years after the Fujifilm S2 Pro which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Fujifilm S2 Pro being a Large SLR camera.
Before diving into a in depth comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the EX-S200 grades vs the Fujifilm S2 Pro with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm S2 Pro Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Fujifilm FinePix S2 Pro. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Fujifilm S2 Pro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Fujifilm S2 Pro
EX-S200 | Fujifilm S2 Pro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2010 | ![]() | August 2002 | Newer by 98 months |
Display size | 2.7" | ![]() | 1.8" | Larger display (+0.9") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 117k | Clearer display (+113k dot) |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S2 Pro over the Casio EX-S200
Fujifilm S2 Pro | EX-S200 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Fujifilm S2 Pro
EX-S200 | Fujifilm S2 Pro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm S2 Pro Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera, you have to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-S200 enjoys outer dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Fujifilm S2 Pro has specifications of 142mm x 131mm x 80mm (5.6" x 5.2" x 3.1") along with a weight of 850 grams (1.87 lbs).
See the Casio EX-S200 versus Fujifilm S2 Pro in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using during that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-S200 vs the Fujifilm S2 Pro.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3cec5/3cec5cf7ae1824d4326daccaf2aebf46cfc77333" alt="Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm S2 Pro size comparison Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm S2 Pro size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-S200 and Fujifilm S2 Pro is 96 and 56 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e071f/e071f98a3313caebcbdbb3eff6fb365bed5362e8" alt="Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm S2 Pro top view buttons comparison Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm S2 Pro top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm S2 Pro Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very tough to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions just by checking specs. The picture below should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S200 and Fujifilm S2 Pro.
All in all, both the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The EX-S200 using its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Casio EX-S200 will give you greater detail using its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics way more aggressively. The newer EX-S200 should have an advantage in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/704cc/704ccdba8303d67c20c5114dc0dcb916fa27a71f" alt="Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm S2 Pro sensor size comparison Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm S2 Pro sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm S2 Pro Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aa59b/aa59b5ade85c0407b0d20d1eb3135535ed6ab3d0" alt="Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm S2 Pro Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm S2 Pro Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm S2 Pro Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Fujifilm FinePix S2 Pro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | FujiFilm |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Fujifilm FinePix S2 Pro |
Category | Ultracompact | Pro DSLR |
Revealed | 2010-08-03 | 2002-08-02 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Large SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23 x 15.5mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 356.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 6 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4256 x 2848 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 50 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Nikon F |
Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | - |
Total lenses | - | 309 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.6 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 1.8" |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 117k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 92 percent |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 15.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/125s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 132 gr (0.29 lb) | 850 gr (1.87 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 142 x 131 x 80mm (5.6" x 5.2" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-120 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2, 5, 2 or 100 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SmartMedia, Compact Flash Type I or II |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $0 | $2,000 |