Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm S9400W
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm S9400W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Introduced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Introduced January 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm S9400W Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm S9400W, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and FujiFilm. The resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the Fujifilm S9400W (16MP) is relatively similar and they enjoy the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-S200 was released 4 years before the Fujifilm S9400W which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Fujifilm S9400W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the EX-S200 scores vs the Fujifilm S9400W in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm S9400W Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Fujifilm FinePix S9400W. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Fujifilm S9400W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Fujifilm S9400W
| EX-S200 | Fujifilm S9400W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9400W over the Casio EX-S200
| Fujifilm S9400W | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2014 |  | August 2010 | Newer by 41 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Fujifilm S9400W
| EX-S200 | Fujifilm S9400W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm S9400W Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-S200 has got physical measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Fujifilm S9400W has sizing of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm S9400W in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-S200 versus the Fujifilm S9400W.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S200 and Fujifilm S9400W is 96 and 61 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm S9400W Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to see the difference between sensor dimensions merely by reading technical specs. The pic here may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-S200 and Fujifilm S9400W.
As you can tell, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Fujifilm S9400W to deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged EX-S200 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm S9400W Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm S9400W Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Fujifilm FinePix S9400W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Fujifilm FinePix S9400W |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2010-08-03 | 2014-01-06 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 50 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.9-6.5 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 201 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 97% |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1700s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 7.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 132 gr (0.29 lbs) | 670 gr (1.48 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 500 pictures |
| Style of battery | - | AA |
| Battery model | NP-120 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $0 | $330 |