Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm XQ1
96 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
92 Imaging
38 Features
55 Overall
44
Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Launched August 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 206g - 100 x 59 x 33mm
- Announced November 2013
- Replacement is Fujifilm XQ2
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Overview
Here, we are analyzing the Casio EX-S200 and Fujifilm XQ1, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors Casio and FujiFilm. The image resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the Fujifilm XQ1 (12MP) is very similar but the EX-S200 (1/2.3") and Fujifilm XQ1 (2/3") have totally different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-S200 was manufactured 4 years earlier than the Fujifilm XQ1 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the EX-S200 grades vs the Fujifilm XQ1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Fujifilm XQ1. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Fujifilm XQ1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Fujifilm XQ1
| EX-S200 | Fujifilm XQ1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XQ1 over the Casio EX-S200
| Fujifilm XQ1 | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | November 2013 | August 2010 | Fresher by 40 months | |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Fujifilm XQ1
| EX-S200 | Fujifilm XQ1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera often, you will need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-S200 has external measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm XQ1 has measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-S200 and Fujifilm XQ1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-S200 and the Fujifilm XQ1.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and Fujifilm XQ1 is 96 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its hard to envision the difference between sensor sizing merely by reading a spec sheet. The visual underneath might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-S200 and Fujifilm XQ1.
Clearly, each of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-S200 because of its tinier sensor will make getting shallow DOF harder and the Casio EX-S200 will offer you greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos way more aggressively. The older EX-S200 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-S200 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Fujifilm XQ1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Fujifilm XQ1 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2010-08-03 | 2013-11-26 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS X-TRANS II |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 2/3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8.8 x 6.6mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 58.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 50 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/1.8-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 12.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 7.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, on, off, slow syncho |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 132g (0.29 lbs) | 206g (0.45 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 100 x 59 x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photos |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-120 | NP-48 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $0 | $500 |