Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M340
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
96 Imaging
33 Features
11 Overall
24
Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M340 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Introduced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.1-5.7) lens
- 115g - 96 x 59 x 19mm
- Released January 2009
Photography Glossary Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M340 Overview
In this write-up, we are reviewing the Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M340, both Ultracompact digital cameras by brands Casio and Kodak. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the EX-S200 (14MP) and M340 (10MP) but they possess the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-S200 was announced 20 months after the M340 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before going through a detailed comparison, below is a brief summary of how the EX-S200 scores vs the M340 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M340 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-S200 and Kodak EasyShare M340. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-S200 Gallery and Kodak M340 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Kodak M340
| EX-S200 | M340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2010 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 20 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Kodak M340 over the Casio EX-S200
| M340 | EX-S200 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Kodak M340
| EX-S200 | M340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equivalent display dimensions |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Absent Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M340 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and size. The Casio EX-S200 provides external dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Kodak M340 has specifications of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 115 grams (0.25 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M340 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-S200 compared to the M340.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S200 and M340 is 96 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M340 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizes merely by reading through a spec sheet. The image below should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S200 and M340.
As you can see, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You should anticipate the Casio EX-S200 to give more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images a little more aggressively. The fresher EX-S200 provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M340 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M340 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Kodak EasyShare M340 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Kodak |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Kodak EasyShare M340 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2010-08-03 | 2009-01-05 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3664 x 2748 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 50 | 64 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 5 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.1-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 7cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 132 gr (0.29 lbs) | 115 gr (0.25 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 96 x 59 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-120 | KLIC-7001 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $0 | $130 |