Clicky

Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M341

Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
25
Overall
32
Casio Exilim EX-S200 front
 
Kodak EasyShare M341 front
Portability
96
Imaging
35
Features
14
Overall
26

Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M341 Key Specs

Casio EX-S200
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 50 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
  • Launched August 2010
Kodak M341
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-175mm (F3.0-4.8) lens
  • 135g - 96 x 59 x 19mm
  • Released July 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M341 Overview

Here, we are looking at the Casio EX-S200 versus Kodak M341, both Ultracompact digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Kodak. The image resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the M341 (12MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

The EX-S200 was manufactured 13 months later than the M341 making them a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before going right into a full comparison, here is a short summary of how the EX-S200 matches up versus the M341 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Kodak M341

 EX-S200 M341 
ReleasedAugust 2010July 2009Fresher by 13 months
Manually focus Dial precise focusing

Reasons to pick Kodak M341 over the Casio EX-S200

 M341 EX-S200 
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")

Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Kodak M341

 EX-S200 M341 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kThe same display resolution
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch display Absent Touch display

Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M341 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-S200 has external dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Kodak M341 has proportions of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs).

Look at the Casio EX-S200 versus Kodak M341 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-S200 and the M341.

Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M341 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and M341 is 96 and 96 respectively.

Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M341 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M341 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be hard to picture the difference between sensor sizing purely by reading through specifications. The visual underneath should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S200 and M341.

Plainly, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but different MP. You can anticipate the Casio EX-S200 to give you greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics way more aggressively. The more modern EX-S200 should have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M341 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M341 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M341 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Casio EX-S200
Portrait photography with Kodak M341
35
you can focus manually
decent MP (14MP)
no manual mode
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
21
lack of manual focus
no manual control
external flash not possible
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Street photography factors
Kodak M341 Street photography factors
57
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
48
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Sports photography info
Kodak M341 Sports photography info
38
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
17
max shutter speed is low (1/1,400 seconds)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Travel photography information
Kodak M341 Travel photography information
65
decent MP (14MP)
built-in flash
pretty wide (27mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
52
flash built-in
does not have Timelapse mode
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
wide angle not good (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Landscape photography factors
Kodak M341 Landscape photography factors
42
you can focus manually
pretty wide (27mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
no manual mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
does not have Time Lapse recording
28
screen size is decent (3 inch)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
does not have Timelapse mode
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Vlogging factors
Kodak M341 Vlogging factors
29
pretty wide (27mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have mic socket
22
wide angle not good (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pxls)
does not have external microphone support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M341 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-S200 and Kodak M341
 Casio Exilim EX-S200Kodak EasyShare M341
General Information
Brand Name Casio Kodak
Model Casio Exilim EX-S200 Kodak EasyShare M341
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Launched 2010-08-03 2009-07-29
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by Exilim Engine 5.0 -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 4320 x 3240 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 3200 1600
Min native ISO 50 64
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 27-108mm (4.0x) 35-175mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.2-5.9 f/3.0-4.8
Macro focus distance - 10cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7" 3"
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4s 8s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/1400s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range - 3.20 m
Flash options Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 132 grams (0.29 lb) 135 grams (0.30 lb)
Physical dimensions 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") 96 x 59 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-120 KLIC-7003
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Launch cost $0 $130