Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M380
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
95 Imaging
33 Features
13 Overall
25
Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M380 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Revealed August 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-190mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 155g - 100 x 60 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2009
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M380 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Casio EX-S200 and Kodak M380, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors Casio and Kodak. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the EX-S200 (14MP) and M380 (10MP) but they feature the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-S200 was revealed 20 months later than the M380 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before getting straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a simple overview of how the EX-S200 grades versus the M380 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M380 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Kodak EasyShare M380. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Kodak M380 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Kodak M380
| EX-S200 | M380 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2010 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 20 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Kodak M380 over the Casio EX-S200
| M380 | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Kodak M380
| EX-S200 | M380 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M380 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-S200 features physical measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Kodak M380 has proportions of 100mm x 60mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-S200 and Kodak M380 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use during that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-S200 vs the M380.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-S200 and M380 is 96 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M380 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to visualise the difference between sensor measurements only by looking at technical specs. The graphic below might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-S200 and M380.
As you have seen, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Casio EX-S200 to give you more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more recent EX-S200 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M380 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M380 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Kodak EasyShare M380 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Kodak |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Kodak EasyShare M380 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2010-08-03 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 50 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 38-190mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1448 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 2.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 132 gr (0.29 lbs) | 155 gr (0.34 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 100 x 60 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-120 | KLIC-7003 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $0 | $160 |