Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M381
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
95 Imaging
35 Features
13 Overall
26
Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M381 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Launched August 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F3.0-4.8) lens
- 153g - 101 x 60 x 20mm
- Announced July 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M381 Overview
The following is a in depth assessment of the Casio EX-S200 versus Kodak M381, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors Casio and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the M381 (12MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-S200 was launched 13 months after the M381 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before getting straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the EX-S200 grades against the M381 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M381 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-S200 and Kodak EasyShare M381. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-S200 Gallery and Kodak M381 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Kodak M381
| EX-S200 | M381 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2010 |  | July 2009 | Newer by 13 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Kodak M381 over the Casio EX-S200
| M381 | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Kodak M381
| EX-S200 | M381 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M381 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-S200 has got outside measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Kodak M381 has sizing of 101mm x 60mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 153 grams (0.34 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-S200 versus Kodak M381 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you select at that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-S200 and the M381.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and M381 is 96 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M381 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions simply by checking specs. The picture underneath should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-S200 and M381.
As you can plainly see, both cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Casio EX-S200 to give greater detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more recent EX-S200 will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M381 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M381 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Kodak EasyShare M381 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Kodak |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Kodak EasyShare M381 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2010-08-03 | 2009-07-29 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 50 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.0-4.8 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1400 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 132g (0.29 lbs) | 153g (0.34 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 101 x 60 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-120 | KLIC-7003 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $0 | $170 |
