Clicky

Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak Mini

Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
25
Overall
32
Casio Exilim EX-S200 front
 
Kodak EasyShare Mini front
Portability
97
Imaging
33
Features
13
Overall
25

Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak Mini Key Specs

Casio EX-S200
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 50 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
  • Introduced August 2010
Kodak Mini
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1000
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 29-87mm (F3.0-4.8) lens
  • 99g - 86 x 53 x 18mm
  • Announced January 2011
Apple patent reveals improved iPhone camera durability

Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak Mini Overview

Lets take a deeper look at the Casio EX-S200 versus Kodak Mini, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors Casio and Kodak. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the EX-S200 (14MP) and Mini (10MP) and the EX-S200 (1/2.3") and Mini (1/3") offer different sensor dimensions.

AI-Powered Photo Editing Tools Could Be Added to WhatsApp

The EX-S200 was announced 5 months prior to the Mini and they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before delving into a in depth comparison, here is a short summary of how the EX-S200 matches up versus the Mini with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Nikon Coolpix camera search on Google skyrockets by 8,500%
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Kodak Mini

 EX-S200 Mini 
Focus manually Very precise focus
Display size2.7"2.5"Larger display (+0.2")

Reasons to pick Kodak Mini over the Casio EX-S200

 Mini EX-S200 

Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Kodak Mini

 EX-S200 Mini 
AnnouncedAugust 2010January 2011Similar generation
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kThe same display resolution
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch display Missing Touch display

Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak Mini Physical Comparison

In case you're going to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-S200 has outside measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Kodak Mini has sizing of 86mm x 53mm x 18mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.7") and a weight of 99 grams (0.22 lbs).

Check the Casio EX-S200 versus Kodak Mini in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-S200 against the Mini.

Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak Mini size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and Mini is 96 and 97 respectively.

Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak Mini top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak Mini Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is very hard to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements only by reading specifications. The photograph here should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-S200 and Mini.

Plainly, each of the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The EX-S200 with its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Casio EX-S200 will offer you extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics way more aggressively.

Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak Mini sensor size comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak Mini Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak Mini Screen and Viewfinder comparison
TikTok Developing Photo App to Challenge Instagram's Dominance

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Portrait photography highlights
Kodak Mini Portrait photography highlights
35
focusing manually
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
25
offers face detection focus
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
can't use external flash
low megapixels (10MP)
small sensor size (1/3")
has no RAW format
Ulanzi's Tripod Ensures Ultra Smooth Filming

Street Comparison

Street photography with Casio EX-S200
Street photography with Kodak Mini
57
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
48
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
small sensor size (1/3")
has no RAW format
max ISO too low (1,000)
Leica struggles with L-Mount camera sales, tougher than Q or M

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-S200 as a Sports photography camera
Kodak Mini as a Sports photography camera
38
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
16
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Google AI Gemini Could Enhance iPhone Experience, Talks Suggest

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Travel photography details
Kodak Mini Travel photography details
65
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
really wide (27mm)
lack of Timelapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
52
has built in flash
does not have Time Lapse recording
low megapixels (10MP)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
wide angle not great (29mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
Peek Behind the Lens of 'Photographer' and Their Go-To Cameras

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Landscape photography features
Kodak Mini Landscape photography features
42
focusing manually
really wide (27mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
manual exposure not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
lack of Timelapse function
22
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (29mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
tiny screen (2.5 inches)
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/3")
max ISO too low (1,000)
has no RAW format
does not have Time Lapse recording
Europe Approves Revolutionary AI Legislation

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Vlogging factors
Kodak Mini Vlogging factors
29
really wide (27mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (640 x 480 pxls)
lack of external microphone support
25
offers face detection focus
wide angle not great (29mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have external mic port
Fujifilm accuses Eastman Kodak of patent violation in new lawsuit

Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak Mini Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-S200 and Kodak Mini
 Casio Exilim EX-S200Kodak EasyShare Mini
General Information
Make Casio Kodak
Model Casio Exilim EX-S200 Kodak EasyShare Mini
Type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Introduced 2010-08-03 2011-01-04
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip Exilim Engine 5.0 -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 4.8 x 3.6mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 17.3mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 10MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4320 x 3240 3640 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 3200 1000
Lowest native ISO 50 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 27-108mm (4.0x) 29-87mm (3.0x)
Max aperture f/3.2-5.9 f/3.0-4.8
Macro focus distance - 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 7.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.7" 2.5"
Display resolution 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display technology - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 8 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/1400 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 3.50 m
Flash modes Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 132 grams (0.29 lb) 99 grams (0.22 lb)
Physical dimensions 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") 86 x 53 x 18mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-120 KLIC-7006
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots One One
Retail pricing $0 $100