Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak Touch
96 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
95 Imaging
35 Features
34 Overall
34
Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak Touch Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Announced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Announced January 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak Touch Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak Touch, both Ultracompact digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the Touch (14MP) is fairly well matched but the EX-S200 (1/2.3") and Touch (1/3") enjoy different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe EX-S200 was manufactured 5 months before the Touch so they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before we go straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a concise overview of how the EX-S200 matches up vs the Touch in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak Touch Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-S200 and Kodak EasyShare Touch. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-S200 Gallery and Kodak Touch Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Kodak Touch
| EX-S200 | Touch | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Kodak Touch over the Casio EX-S200
| Touch | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Kodak Touch
| EX-S200 | Touch | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2010 | January 2011 | Similar generation | |
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak Touch Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-S200 has got external dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Kodak Touch has sizing of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak Touch in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have at that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-S200 against the Touch.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and Touch is 96 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak Touch Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to picture the contrast between sensor measurements simply by reading through technical specs. The visual here should give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-S200 and Touch.
As you have seen, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact MP but different sensor measurements. The EX-S200 offers the larger sensor which is going to make obtaining shallower DOF simpler.
Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak Touch Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak Touch Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Kodak EasyShare Touch | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Kodak |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Kodak EasyShare Touch |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2010-08-03 | 2011-01-04 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 4.8 x 3.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 17.3mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 50 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 7.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 132g (0.29 pounds) | 150g (0.33 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-120 | KLIC-7006 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $0 | $100 |