Clicky

Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak Touch

Portability
96
Imaging
36
Features
25
Overall
31
Casio Exilim EX-S200 front
 
Kodak EasyShare Touch front
Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
34
Overall
34

Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak Touch Key Specs

Casio EX-S200
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 50 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
  • Announced August 2010
Kodak Touch
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
  • Announced January 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak Touch Overview

Its time to take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak Touch, both Ultracompact digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the Touch (14MP) is fairly well matched but the EX-S200 (1/2.3") and Touch (1/3") enjoy different sensor measurements.

Photography Glossary

The EX-S200 was manufactured 5 months before the Touch so they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before we go straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a concise overview of how the EX-S200 matches up vs the Touch in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

        

Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Kodak Touch

 EX-S200 Touch 
Manually focus More precise focusing

Reasons to pick Kodak Touch over the Casio EX-S200

 Touch EX-S200 
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kCrisper display (+230k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Kodak Touch

 EX-S200 Touch 
AnnouncedAugust 2010January 2011Similar generation
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen

Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak Touch Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-S200 has got external dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Kodak Touch has sizing of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).

Compare the Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak Touch in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have at that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-S200 against the Touch.

Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak Touch size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and Touch is 96 and 95 respectively.

Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak Touch top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak Touch Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is difficult to picture the contrast between sensor measurements simply by reading through technical specs. The visual here should give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-S200 and Touch.

As you have seen, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact MP but different sensor measurements. The EX-S200 offers the larger sensor which is going to make obtaining shallower DOF simpler.

Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak Touch sensor size comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak Touch Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak Touch Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Portrait photography highlights
Kodak Touch Portrait photography highlights
34
you can focus manually
decent megapixels (14MP)
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
32
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
features face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor is very small (1/3")
no RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Street photography factors
Kodak Touch Street photography factors
57
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
47
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/3")
no RAW files
heavier than competition (150 grams)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Sports photography highlights
Kodak Touch Sports photography highlights
38
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
27
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/3")
no phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-S200 as a Travel photography camera
Kodak Touch as a Travel photography camera
65
decent megapixels (14MP)
has built in flash
pretty wide (27mm)
does not have Timelapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
67
megapixel count good (14MP)
flash built-in
relatively wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f)
missing Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition (150g)
does not posses selfie friendly display
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Landscape photography features
Kodak Touch Landscape photography features
42
you can focus manually
pretty wide (27mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen is small (2.7")
no manual exposure
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
does not have Timelapse function
41
relatively wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
megapixel count good (14MP)
lack of manual focus
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
manual exposure not possible
lack of image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/3")
no RAW files
missing Time Lapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Vlogging info
Kodak Touch Vlogging info
29
pretty wide (27mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen is not selfie friendly
low res video (640 x 480 resolution)
does not have microphone port
31
relatively wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f)
touchscreen functionality
features face detection focusing
does not posses selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing external mic support
heavier than competition (150g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak Touch Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-S200 and Kodak Touch
 Casio Exilim EX-S200Kodak EasyShare Touch
General Information
Manufacturer Casio Kodak
Model Casio Exilim EX-S200 Kodak EasyShare Touch
Class Ultracompact Ultracompact
Announced 2010-08-03 2011-01-04
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by Exilim Engine 5.0 -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 4.8 x 3.6mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 17.3mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 4320 x 3240 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 3200 1600
Lowest native ISO 50 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 27-108mm (4.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.2-5.9 -
Macro focus distance - 5cm
Crop factor 5.8 7.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.7 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display technology - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4 seconds 8 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 3.20 m
Flash settings Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 132g (0.29 pounds) 150g (0.33 pounds)
Dimensions 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-120 KLIC-7006
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal
Card slots One One
Cost at release $0 $100