Clicky

Casio EX-S200 vs Nikon L32

Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
25
Overall
32
Casio Exilim EX-S200 front
 
Nikon Coolpix L32 front
Portability
93
Imaging
46
Features
33
Overall
40

Casio EX-S200 vs Nikon L32 Key Specs

Casio EX-S200
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 50 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
  • Revealed August 2010
Nikon L32
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F3.2-6.5) lens
  • 164g - 95 x 60 x 29mm
  • Launched January 2015
AI-Powered Photo Editing Tools Could Be Added to WhatsApp

Casio EX-S200 vs Nikon L32 Overview

Here, we are looking at the Casio EX-S200 versus Nikon L32, both Ultracompact cameras by competitors Casio and Nikon. There is a crucial difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-S200 (14MP) and L32 (20MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor size (1/2.3").

Leica struggles with L-Mount camera sales, tougher than Q or M

The EX-S200 was introduced 5 years prior to the L32 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before going straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a quick summation of how the EX-S200 matches up versus the L32 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Google AI Gemini Could Enhance iPhone Experience, Talks Suggest
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Nikon L32

 EX-S200 L32 
Manual focus More exact focus

Reasons to pick Nikon L32 over the Casio EX-S200

 L32 EX-S200 
LaunchedJanuary 2015August 2010More modern by 54 months
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Selfie screen Take selfies

Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Nikon L32

 EX-S200 L32 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kEqual display resolution
Touch friendly display No Touch friendly display

Casio EX-S200 vs Nikon L32 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-S200 enjoys physical measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Nikon L32 has dimensions of 95mm x 60mm x 29mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 164 grams (0.36 lbs).

Check out the Casio EX-S200 versus Nikon L32 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-S200 against the L32.

Casio EX-S200 vs Nikon L32 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the EX-S200 and L32 is 96 and 93 respectively.

Casio EX-S200 vs Nikon L32 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Nikon L32 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizes just by going through specs. The picture underneath may offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-S200 and L32.

All in all, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Nikon L32 to produce greater detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more aged EX-S200 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Casio EX-S200 vs Nikon L32 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Nikon L32 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-S200 vs Nikon L32 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple patent reveals improved iPhone camera durability

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Portrait photography factors
Nikon L32 Portrait photography factors
35
manual focus
megapixel count good (14MP)
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
39
decent MP (20 megapixels)
has face detect autofocus
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Fujifilm accuses Eastman Kodak of patent violation in new lawsuit

Street Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Street photography advice
Nikon L32 Street photography advice
57
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
56
built in image stabilization (Digital)
fixed screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
heavier than competition (164 grams)
Peek Behind the Lens of 'Photographer' and Their Go-To Cameras

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Sports photography factors
Nikon L32 Sports photography factors
38
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
48
built in image stabilization (Digital)
decent MP (20MP)
great battery life (320 per charge)
no shutter priority
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Ulanzi's Tripod Ensures Ultra Smooth Filming

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-S200 as a Travel photography camera
Nikon L32 as a Travel photography camera
65
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
decently wide (27mm)
lack of Timelapse function
display is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.2)
71
great battery life (320 CIPA)
decent MP (20MP)
flash built-in
screen is selfie friendly
reasonably wide (26mm)
no Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition (164 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
Europe Approves Revolutionary AI Legislation

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-S200 as a Landscape photography camera
Nikon L32 as a Landscape photography camera
42
manual focus
decently wide (27mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14MP)
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
lack of manual exposure
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
lack of Timelapse function
48
reasonably wide (26mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Digital)
decent MP (20 megapixels)
great battery life (320 per charge)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
manual exposure not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
no Time Lapse mode
Nikon Coolpix camera search on Google skyrockets by 8,500%

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Vlogging features
Nikon L32 Vlogging features
29
decently wide (27mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
display is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of microphone support
66
reasonably wide (26mm)
screen is selfie friendly
built in image stabilization (Digital)
has face detect autofocus
slow max aperture (f3.2)
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
no mic jack
heavier than competition (164 grams)
TikTok Developing Photo App to Challenge Instagram's Dominance

Casio EX-S200 vs Nikon L32 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-S200 and Nikon L32
 Casio Exilim EX-S200Nikon Coolpix L32
General Information
Brand Name Casio Nikon
Model Casio Exilim EX-S200 Nikon Coolpix L32
Class Ultracompact Ultracompact
Revealed 2010-08-03 2015-01-14
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Exilim Engine 5.0 -
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 20MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 4320 x 3240 5152 x 3864
Max native ISO 3200 1600
Min native ISO 50 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 27-108mm (4.0x) 26-130mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.2-5.9 f/3.2-6.5
Macro focus distance - 10cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4s 4s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - 4.30 m
Flash modes Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction -
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Max video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 132g (0.29 pounds) 164g (0.36 pounds)
Physical dimensions 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") 95 x 60 x 29mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 320 pictures
Battery format - AA
Battery model NP-120 2 x AA
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (10 secs)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Cost at release $0 $120