Casio EX-S200 vs Nikon S220
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
97 Imaging
33 Features
11 Overall
24
Casio EX-S200 vs Nikon S220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Introduced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 2000
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 100g - 90 x 56 x 18mm
- Revealed February 2009
Photography Glossary Casio EX-S200 vs Nikon S220 Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the Casio EX-S200 and Nikon S220, both Ultracompact digital cameras by brands Casio and Nikon. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-S200 (14MP) and S220 (10MP) but they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsThe EX-S200 was announced 19 months after the S220 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before going through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick summary of how the EX-S200 scores versus the S220 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-S200 vs Nikon S220 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Nikon Coolpix S220. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Nikon S220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Nikon S220
| EX-S200 | S220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2010 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 19 months |
| Manually focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Screen dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Nikon S220 over the Casio EX-S200
| S220 | EX-S200 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Nikon S220
| EX-S200 | S220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
Casio EX-S200 vs Nikon S220 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-S200 enjoys exterior dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Nikon S220 has sizing of 90mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.5" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 100 grams (0.22 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-S200 and Nikon S220 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-S200 versus the S220.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-S200 and S220 is 96 and 97 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Nikon S220 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to picture the difference between sensor dimensions simply by checking technical specs. The image here should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-S200 and S220.
As you can tell, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You can expect the Casio EX-S200 to give greater detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more recent EX-S200 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-S200 vs Nikon S220 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-S200 vs Nikon S220 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Nikon Coolpix S220 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Nikon |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Nikon Coolpix S220 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2010-08-03 | 2009-02-03 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 2000 |
| Minimum native ISO | 50 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 11.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On, Slow sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 132g (0.29 pounds) | 100g (0.22 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 90 x 56 x 18mm (3.5" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-120 | EN-EL10 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (3 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $0 | $56 |
