Casio EX-S200 vs Nikon S6900
96 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
93 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Casio EX-S200 vs Nikon S6900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Launched August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-6.3) lens
- 181g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Revealed February 2015
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-S200 vs Nikon S6900 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Casio EX-S200 versus Nikon S6900, both Ultracompact cameras by manufacturers Casio and Nikon. The sensor resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the S6900 (16MP) is very comparable and both cameras offer the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-S200 was introduced 5 years earlier than the S6900 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before diving into a full comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the EX-S200 grades against the S6900 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-S200 vs Nikon S6900 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Nikon Coolpix S6900. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Nikon S6900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Nikon S6900
| EX-S200 | S6900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focus |
Reasons to pick Nikon S6900 over the Casio EX-S200
| S6900 | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2015 |  | August 2010 | Fresher by 55 months |
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Nikon S6900
| EX-S200 | S6900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Casio EX-S200 vs Nikon S6900 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-S200 features exterior measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Nikon S6900 has sizing of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-S200 versus Nikon S6900 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at that moment. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-S200 versus the S6900.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S200 and S6900 is 96 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Nikon S6900 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizing just by checking out specifications. The graphic here may give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-S200 and S6900.
To sum up, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Nikon S6900 to show more detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos way more aggressively. The older EX-S200 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-S200 vs Nikon S6900 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-S200 vs Nikon S6900 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Nikon Coolpix S6900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Nikon |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Nikon Coolpix S6900 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2010-08-03 | 2015-02-10 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 50 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.3-6.3 |
| Macro focus range | - | 2cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 9.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 2.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 132 gr (0.29 lbs) | 181 gr (0.40 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 180 pictures |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-120 | EN-EL19 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $0 | $190 |