Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus TG-870
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus TG-870 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Announced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Bump to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Launched January 2016
- Replaced the Olympus TG-860
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus TG-870 Overview
Following is a complete assessment of the Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus TG-870, both Ultracompact cameras by brands Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the TG-870 (16MP) is fairly close and they feature the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-S200 was introduced 6 years earlier than the TG-870 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before we go through a thorough comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the EX-S200 matches up vs the TG-870 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus TG-870 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-S200 and Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-S200 Gallery and Olympus TG-870 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Olympus TG-870
| EX-S200 | TG-870 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Casio EX-S200
| TG-870 | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2016 |  | August 2010 | More modern by 66 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Olympus TG-870
| EX-S200 | TG-870 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus TG-870 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-S200 has physical measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-870 has dimensions of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") having a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus TG-870 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-S200 vs the TG-870.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and TG-870 is 96 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus TG-870 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizes only by viewing a spec sheet. The pic underneath should offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-S200 and TG-870.
Clearly, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You should anticipate the Olympus TG-870 to result in more detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images far more aggressively. The more aged EX-S200 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus TG-870 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2010-08-03 | 2016-01-06 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 50 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.5-5.7 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 7.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 132g (0.29 pounds) | 221g (0.49 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photographs |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-120 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $0 | $280 |
