Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus XZ-10
96 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus XZ-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Revealed August 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Revealed January 2013
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus XZ-10 Overview
In this write-up, we will be comparing the Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus XZ-10, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the XZ-10 (12MP) is pretty similar and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-S200 was introduced 3 years prior to the XZ-10 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a full comparison, below is a short introduction of how the EX-S200 grades against the XZ-10 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus XZ-10 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Olympus Stylus XZ-10. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Olympus XZ-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Olympus XZ-10
| EX-S200 | XZ-10 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Casio EX-S200
| XZ-10 | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 |  | August 2010 | More modern by 30 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Olympus XZ-10
| EX-S200 | XZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen |
Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus XZ-10 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-S200 features outside dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-10 has dimensions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus XZ-10 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the EX-S200 versus the XZ-10.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S200 and XZ-10 is 96 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus XZ-10 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to see the gap between sensor sizes just by reviewing technical specs. The pic below may give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-S200 and XZ-10.
As you can tell, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Casio EX-S200 to offer you greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures far more aggressively. The more aged EX-S200 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus XZ-10 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2010-08-03 | 2013-01-30 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 50 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 35 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/1.8-2.7 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 132 gr (0.29 lbs) | 221 gr (0.49 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photographs |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-120 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $0 | $428 |